Site mapAbout usConsultative CommitteeAsk LibrarianContributionCopyrightCitation GuidelineDonationHome        

CatalogAuthor AuthorityGoogle
Search engineFulltextScripturesLanguage LessonsLinks
 


Extra service
Tools
Export
Representing Buddhism through Mise-en-scène, Diegesis, and Mimesis: Kim Ki-duk’s Spring, Summer, Fall, Winter… and Spring
Author Green, Ronald S. ; Mun, Chan-ju
Source International Journal of Buddhist Thought & Culture=국제불교문화사상사학회
Volumev.29 n.1
Date2019.06
Pages177 - 203
PublisherInternational Association for Buddhist Thought and Culture
Publisher Url http://iabtc.org/
LocationSeoul, Korea [首爾, 韓國]
Content type期刊論文=Journal Article
Language英文=English
NoteAuthor Affiliations: Ronald S. GREEN(University of Wisconsin-Madison), Chanju MUN(Dongguk University)
KeywordBuddhist Movies; Cinematic Symbolism; Seasonal Allegory; Religious Narratives; Visual Design
AbstractThis paper examines elements identified as “Buddhist” in the Korean film Spring, Summer, Fall, Winter… and Spring (K. Pom yŏrŭm kaŭl kyŏul kŭrigo pom) written and directed by Kim Ki-duk (b. 1960) and released in 2003. It draws on research on this topic by numerous notable researchers of Korean film. For the sake of our investigation, we have arranged various points made by these scholars into three sections reflecting categories philosophers have long used to analyze drama. These are (1) mise-en-scene: the visual design of the film, (2) diegesis: the fictive narrative space of the film, and (3) mimesis: symbolic or ritual action in the film. This arrangement is based on a study of Spring, Summer, Fall, Winter… and Spring by Pak Chongch’ŏn. This paper reorganizes Pak’s analysis and expands it to include the ideas of other Korean critics along with our own. Specifically, the paper looks at how the director uses mimicry, seasonal allegory, and various elements of visual design to create a multifaceted religious narrative. We analyze his assorted usages of Buddhist iconographical images and temple sounds including chanting of the Heart Sūtra, but argue that Kim additionally builds the storyline with cinematic symbolism and metaphor taken from Yin/Yang philosophy, Five Elements theory, Christianity, Jainism, and Korean folklore. We also offer a theory of Buddhist adoptive society in terms of the island and orphan metaphor found in the film. The paper considers whether Spring, Summer, Fall, Winter… and Spring falls short of the requirements necessary for designating it as a “Buddhist film” as argued by a number of researchers, particularly if it lacks a soteriological solution to the inherent problem of human suffering at the forefront of the movie.
Table of contentsAbstract
Mise-en-scène: The Visual Design of the Film 179
Diegesis: The Narrative World of the Film 186
Mimesis: Symbolic or Ritual Action in the Film 191
Conclusions 197
References 202
ISSN15987914 (P)
DOI10.16893/IJBTC.2019.06.29.1.177
Hits302
Created date2021.03.11
Modified date2021.03.11



Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE

Notice

You are leaving our website for The full text resources provided by the above database or electronic journals may not be displayed due to the domain restrictions or fee-charging download problems.

Record correction

Please delete and correct directly in the form below, and click "Apply" at the bottom.
(When receiving your information, we will check and correct the mistake as soon as possible.)

Serial No.
607589

Search History (Only show 10 bibliography limited)
Search Criteria Field Codes
Search CriteriaBrowse