Site mapAbout usConsultative CommitteeAsk LibrarianContributionCopyrightCitation GuidelineDonationHome        

CatalogAuthor AuthorityGoogle
Search engineFulltextScripturesLanguage LessonsLinks
 


Extra service
Tools
Export
『종경록(宗鏡錄)』 유식(唯識)사상 소고=A Study on Yogācāra Thoughts of Zong-jing-lu(宗鏡錄)
Author 박인석 (著)=Park, Inn-suk (au.)
Source 불교학연구=Korea Journal of Buddhist Studies
Volumev.14
Date2006.08
Pages159 - 182
Publisher불교학연구회=佛教學研究會
Publisher Url http://www.kabs.re.kr/
LocationDaegu, South Korea [大邱, 韓國]
Content type期刊論文=Journal Article
Language韓文=Korean
Keyword영명연수=永明延壽=Yong-ming Yan-shou; 『종경록』=宗鏡錄=Zong-jing lu; 구분유식=具分唯識=perfect yogācāra thoughts; 불구분유식=不具分唯識=non-perfect yogācāra thoughts; 아롸야식=阿賴耶識=Ālayavijñāna; 법상종=法相宗=Fa-xiang zong; 법성종=法性宗=Fa-xing zong; 일심=一心=One Mind; 불변=不變=changeless; 수연=隨緣=participating in change
Abstract The purpose of this study is to examine the yogācāra thoughts of Zong-jing-lu (宗鏡錄) by Yong-ming Yan-shou (永明延壽: 904-974) who lived in Wu-dai (五代) period in China. Yogācāra thoughts occupies an important part in Zong-jing lu.Yan-shou's perspective on yogācāra thoughts is different from Fa-xiang-zong (法相宗) in Tang (唐) dynasty. First of all, he divides yogācāra thoughts into two, perfect (具分) and non-perfect (不具分). Perfect yogācāra thought is based upon Ālayavijñāna (阿賴耶識) in which 'neither birth nor death (不生滅)' diffuses harmoniously with 'birth and death(生滅)', and yet in which both are neither identical nor different. This opinion on Ālayavijñāna is same with that of The Awakening of Faith (大乘起信論). Non-perfect yogācāra thought is based upon Ālayavijñāna, lying only in the state of 'birth and death'. This opinion on Ālayavijñāna is that of Fa-xiang zong. Yan-shou regards this thoughts as non-perfect, because it only has a aspect of phenomena (事, 生滅), but don't have a aspect of the Absolute (理, 不生滅).
Furthermore he thinks that perfect yogācāra thoughts is close to original thoughts of Vasubandhu (世親). He bases upon the thoughts of Mahāyāna sūtra like Laṅkāvatārasūtra (楞伽經), etc. and justifies his opinion. According to his explanation, Tathāgata-garbha (如來藏) is clean itself when it doesn't combine with avidyā (無明), but it changes into Ālayavijñāna when it combines with avidyā. And he criticizes that the Cheng-wei-shi-lun's (成唯識論) commentary on 25'th verse of Triṃśikā-vijñapti-mātratā-siddhi (唯識三十頌) is not perfect, through the new interpretation of this verse.
Yan-shou thinks that the key concept of Zong-jing-lu is One Mind (一心) which has two aspects, changelessness (不變) and participation in change (隨緣). He thinks that Fa-xiang-zong deals with the one aspect of One Mind which participates in change, but Fa-xing-zong (法性宗) deals with the two aspects of One Mind. He reaches a conclusion that Fa-xing-zong can include Fa-xiang-zong, and that the One Mind theory is the perfect realization of yogācāra thoughts which originates from Vasubandhu.
Table of contentsI. 서론 159
II. 종의 거울{宗鏡}에 대한 두 가지 논의 160
III. 구분유식(具分唯識)과 불구분유식(不具分唯識) 164
IV. 진여(眞如)의 훈습(薰習) 169
V. 결론 178
ISSN15980642 (P)
Hits624
Created date2021.04.22
Modified date2021.04.26



Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE

Notice

You are leaving our website for The full text resources provided by the above database or electronic journals may not be displayed due to the domain restrictions or fee-charging download problems.

Record correction

Please delete and correct directly in the form below, and click "Apply" at the bottom.
(When receiving your information, we will check and correct the mistake as soon as possible.)

Serial No.
611741

Search History (Only show 10 bibliography limited)
Search Criteria Field Codes
Search CriteriaBrowse