|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
敦煌文獻中的北宗禪=The Northern School’s teaching of the Dunhuang Manuscripts |
|
|
|
| Author |
黃青萍 (著)=Huang, Ching-ping (au.)
|
|---|
| Source |
敦煌學=Studies on Tun-Huang
|
|---|
| Volume | n.34 |
|---|
| Date | 2018.08 |
|---|
| Pages | 199 - 224 |
|---|
| Publisher | 南華大學敦煌學研究中心 |
|---|
| Publisher Url |
https://nhdh.nhu.edu.tw/Web/Index
|
|---|
| Location | 嘉義縣, 臺灣 [Chia-i hsien, Taiwan] |
|---|
| Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| Language | 中文=Chinese |
|---|
| Note | 作者單位：銘傳大學兼任助理教授
Adjunct assistant professor at Ming Chuan University |
|---|
| Keyword | 北宗=the Northern School; 五方便門=Wu fangbian Men; 頓悟真宗要訣=Dunwu Zhenzong Yaolun; 修心要論=Xiuxin YaoLun; 觀心論=Guanxin Lun; 圓明論=Yuanming Lun |
|---|
| Abstract | 本文對於北宗禪法的研究，以語錄、論著類文獻為主，將「五方便門」寫本、 《頓悟真宗要訣》、「《修心要論》連寫本」、《觀心論》、「《圓明論》與〈阿摩羅識〉」 等五件文書，區分為主要文獻與爭議文獻兩類。所謂主要文獻，是能具體呈現北 宗禪法的文書;而爭議文獻則是經過論證、分析後，認定不能歸類為北宗文獻的 文書。因此本文的研究方法，是建立在文獻考證的基礎上，先肯定「五方便門」 寫本與《頓悟真宗要訣》等為主要文獻後，再據以建構北宗禪法，再做為內在的 證據，輔以外在的證據，說明爭議文獻非北宗文書的理由，以釐清北宗的文獻與 禪法內容。
This study about the Northern School’s teaching is based on Chan master’s ‘RecordedSayings’ and Treatises from Dunhuang manuscripts which are Wu Fangbian Men, Dunwu Zhenzong Yaolun, the long manuscripts of Xiuxin Yaolun, Guanxin Lun, and Yuanming Lun. In the pass these texts were treated as the Northern School’s literatures, but according to the philosophy of Chan Buddhism, especially in the theories of mind and the way of practice, we will find that the five texts have obvious difference. Some of them in the theories of mind have Chan Buddhism’s tradition, and others don’t. Therefore the goal of this essay is trying to clarify the difference, divide these texts into main literatures and controversial literatures, and explain it. |
|---|
| Table of contents | 一、前言 201
二、主要文獻及其禪法 202
(一)「五方便門」寫本群及其禪法 202
1.敦煌寫本與撰述者 202
2.禪法內涵 205
(二)《頓悟真宗要訣》及其禪法 208
1.敦煌寫本與撰述者 208
2.禪法內涵 209
(三)《修心要論》連寫本及其禪法 211
1.敦煌寫本與撰述者 211
2.禪法內涵 214
(1)《修心要論》 214
(2)《了性句》 214
(3)澄心論 215
(4)《法性論》 215
三、爭議文獻及其問題 216
(一)《觀心論》 216
1.敦煌寫本與撰述者問題 216
2.禪法內涵 218
(二)《圓明論》與〈阿摩羅識〉 219
1.敦煌寫本與撰述者問題 219
2.禪法內涵 220
(1)《圓明論》 220
(2)〈阿摩羅識〉 221
四、結論 222 |
|---|
| ISSN | 10159339 (P) |
|---|
| Hits | 435 |
|---|
| Created date | 2021.05.05 |
|---|
| Modified date | 2021.05.05 |
|---|
 |
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
|
|
