|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buddhist Confession: A Foucauldian Approach=佛教徒的懺悔：以傅柯的觀點 |
|
|
|
| Author |
Voyce, Malcolm (著)=馮亦斯 (au.)
|
|---|
| Source |
聖嚴研究：第三輯=Studies of Master Sheng Yen No.3
|
|---|
| Date | 2012.06 |
|---|
| Pages | 303 - 348 |
|---|
| Publisher | 法鼓文化 |
|---|
| Publisher Url |
http://www.ddc.com.tw/
|
|---|
| Location | 臺北, 臺灣 [Taipei, Taiwan] |
|---|
| Series | 聖嚴思想論叢 |
|---|
| Series No. | 3 |
|---|
| Content type | 專題研究論文=Research Paper |
|---|
| Language | 英文=English |
|---|
| Note | Author Affiliations: Associate Professor, School of Law, Macquarie University=澳洲麥克里大學法學院副教授 |
|---|
| Keyword | Confession=告解; Buddhism=佛教; Vinaya=戒律學; Foucault=傅柯; Monasteries=禪林 |
|---|
| Abstract | While some scholarship has considered the significance of confession as a disciplinary measure in the Christian context, there is no appropriate analysis of the disciplinary aspects of confession as regards the rules of Buddhist monks. This article offers a critique of “Buddhist confession” in the light of Foucault’s writings on confession.
While Foucault did not consider the Vinaya, or for that matter Buddhism in general, his writings may be used to infer how monastics may have been molded by institutional practices and to infer how monastics shaped their own inner life to form their own mode of institutionalized self-discipline.
雖然有些學者已研究過基督宗教中告解做為戒律的意義，但並沒有適當的研究以戒律學的各個面向探討佛教出家眾關於懺悔的戒律。本研究由傅柯的著作中，用批判的觀點探討佛教的懺悔。
傅柯雖然沒有研究過戒律學或者佛教，但是仍可由他的著作中推斷出家眾如何被機構化的實踐所形塑，以及推斷這些出家眾如何形塑自己的內在生活，使自己能合乎於機構化的自律模式。 |
|---|
| Table of contents | 1. Foucault, Religion and Monasteries 304
2. The Rules of Buddhist Monks 311
3. The Role of Confession in the Sangha 320
4. The Subjective and Objective Role of Confession 323
Abbreviations 337
Buddhist Texts 338
Bibliography 339
中文摘要 348 |
|---|
| Hits | 137 |
|---|
| Created date | 2021.07.23 |
|---|
| Modified date | 2021.07.23 |
|---|
 |
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
|
|
