|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
圓測「佛性理論」再考察 ──以《解深密經疏》為依據=An Enquiry Concerning “Buddha-nature theory” of Yuan-tsch(Won-cheuk): Based on the Jieshenmi Jing Shu |
|
|
|
| Author |
楊得煜 (著)=Yang, De-yu (au.)
|
|---|
| Source |
圓光佛學學報=Yuan Kuang Journal of Buddhist Studies
|
|---|
| Volume | n.38 |
|---|
| Date | 2021.12 |
|---|
| Pages | 125 - 154 |
|---|
| Publisher | 圓光佛學研究所=Yuan Kuang Buddhist College |
|---|
| Publisher Url |
http://www.ykbi.edu.tw/
|
|---|
| Location | 桃園縣, 臺灣 [Taoyuean hsien, Taiwan] |
|---|
| Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| Language | 中文=Chinese |
|---|
| Note | 作者單位：國立臺灣大學哲學系博士後研究 |
|---|
| Keyword | 佛性=Buddha-nature; 理性=li foxing; 行性=xing foxing; 種姓=Buddha-gotra; 一乘思想=ekāyāna |
|---|
| Abstract | 本文從學者對於圓測「佛性理論」立場諍論出發，當代學者，如羽溪了諦（A.D. 1916）、金東柱（A.D. 1986）、Cho Eun-su（A.D. 1997）、Hwang Chang-geun（A.D. 2000）等人，根據《解深密經疏》，主張圓測「佛性理論」中的「一乘思想」屬於「皆成說」，也就是「包含闡提在內的眾生皆可成佛」。筆者論文試圖從二方面著手，一者，考察上述學者主張「皆成說」得以成立的論式。再者，同時檢討此論式背後預設的佛性理論，能否與圓測在《解深密經疏》的詮釋若合符節？筆者發現上述學者主張圓測的佛性理論屬於「皆成說」，是基於「無為義」之佛性；然筆者發現在此《疏》中，圓測仍遵守無為法與有為法的區分架構，將「佛性」區分為「理佛性」與「行佛性」，前者屬於無為義的佛性，不在因果關係當中，不作為成佛的原因義；圓測明確的將「成佛如何可能之根據」建立在「有為義」之「行佛性」上。據此，圓測的佛性理論並不合於學者們所主張的「皆成說」。
This paper begins with a review of the debates among scholarsabout how to properly understand the “Buddha-nature theory” of Yuan-tsch (Won-cheuk). The scholars, (e.g., 羽溪了諦 (A.D. 1916), 金東柱 (A.D. 1986), Cho Eun-su (A.D. 1997), Hwang Chang-geun (A.D.2000), etc., according to Jieshenmi Jing Shu, they argue that Yuantsch‟s (Won-cheuk) ekāyāna thought of „Buddha-nature theory‟ belonged to “all sentient beings are able to become Buddhas” This paper sets about two steps: first, I will investigate that how scholars prove their claims. Second, I will investigate their claims that is corresponded with Yuan-tsch‟ s(Won-cheuk) Jieshenmi Jing Shu. I find that scholars claims are based on the unconditioned Buddhanature (asaṃskāra), but I find that Yuan-tsch(Won-cheuk) still was following an interpretative tradition under which the strict distinction between the unconditioned vs. the conditioned realms, and I find in the Jieshenmi Jing Shu Yuan-tsch(Won-cheuk) distinguished between two kinds of Buddha-nature: “Buddha-nature of Principle” (li foxing 理佛性) vs. the “Buddha-nature of Practice” (xing foxing 行佛性). The former belongs to unconditioned, the latter is the conditioned realms. According to Jieshenmi Jing Shu Yuan-tsch (Won-cheuk) contributes to the actuality that some sentient beings do become Buddhas is based on “Buddha-nature of Practice”, instead of “Buddhanature of Principle” Finally, “Buddha-nature theory” of Yuan-tsch (Won-cheuk) is not identified with the “all sentient beings are able to become Buddhas”. |
|---|
| Table of contents | 一、導言 130
二、支持「皆成說」的文獻及當代學者的詮釋 132
(一) 支持「皆成說」的文獻 132
(二) 當代學者的詮釋：皆得證涅槃之根據來自「佛性」 135
三、「皆成說」觀點再檢討：圓測對於「佛性」概念的會釋 140
(一)《解深密經疏》中的二種佛性：「理佛性」與「行佛性」 142
(二)《解深密經疏》：「行佛性」與「無漏種子」概念相似 146
四、結語 150 |
|---|
| ISSN | 16086848 (P) |
|---|
| Hits | 486 |
|---|
| Created date | 2022.04.01 |
|---|
| Modified date | 2022.08.03 |
|---|
 |
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
|
|
