|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What is Debate for? The Rationality of Tibetan Debates and the Role of Humor |
|
|
|
Author |
Dreyfus, Georges B. J. (著)
|
Source |
Argumentation
|
Volume | v.22 n.1 |
Date | 2008 |
Pages | 43 - 58 |
Publisher | Springer |
Publisher Url |
https://link.springer.com/
|
Location | Dordrecht, the Netherlands [多德雷赫特, 荷蘭] |
Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
Language | 英文=English |
Keyword | Debate; Tibetan Buddhism; Rationality; Humor; Dialectics |
Abstract | In this essay, I examine the mode of operation and aim of debates in the Tibetan Buddhist traditions. I contrast the probative form of argument that was privileged by the Indian tradition to the more agonic practice favored by Tibetan scholastics. I also examine the rules that preside over this dialectical practice, which is seen by the Tibetan tradition as essential to a proper scholastic education. I argue, however, that the practice of debates cannot be reduced to this dialectical model, for it has an important performative aspect not easily encompassed by the rules. I examine this aspect of Tibetan debates, focusing particularly on the role of humor. I conclude with a few remarks on the type of rationality entailed by the importance of humor and of other rhetorical elements involved in Tibetan debates. |
Table of contents | 1 Introduction 2 Debate as a Dialectical Practice 3 Rules and Procedures of Debate 4 The Performative Nature of Tibetan Debates 5 The Role of Humor |
ISSN | 0920427X (P); 15728374 (E) |
DOI | 10.1007/s10503-007-9079-2 |
Hits | 165 |
Created date | 2022.05.03 |
Modified date | 2022.05.10 |
|
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
|
|