 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
円月の行信論研究=A Study of Engetsu’s Theory of Practice and Faith |
|
|
|
| Author |
伊藤雅玄 (著)=いとうまさはる (au.)
|
|---|
| Source |
印度學佛教學研究 =Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies=Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū
|
|---|
| Volume | v.65 n.2 (總號=n.141) |
|---|
| Date | 2017.03.20 |
|---|
| Pages | 658 - 661 |
|---|
| Publisher | 日本印度学仏教学会 |
|---|
| Publisher Url |
http://www.jaibs.jp/
|
|---|
| Location | 東京, 日本 [Tokyo, Japan] |
|---|
| Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| Language | 日文=Japanese |
|---|
| Note | 龍谷大学大学院 |
|---|
| Keyword | 行信論; 円月; 善海; 月珠; 善譲; 豊前学派; 空華学派 |
|---|
| Abstract | This paper examines how Engetsu’s 円月 doctrinal disputes with Zenkai 善海 influenced the development of Engetsu’s theory of practice and faith. In this dispute, Zenkai criticized Gesshu’s 月珠 theory of practice and faith. Gesshu was Engetsu’s master and Engetsu responded to the criticism in place of Gesshu. Zenkai’s criticism contained three major points, the most important being that the virtue of myōgō 名号 lies only in the invocation of Amitābha’s Name, shōmyō 称名. Engetsu responded by emphasizing that the virtues of myōgō are not only contained in the invocation of Amitābha’s Name but embraced in gonen 五念 (five gates of mindfulness). Engetsu emphasized a point that differed from Gesshu on the idea of practice and faith. This difference may be regarded as the development of ideas of practice and faith from Gesshu to Engetsu. |
|---|
| Table of contents | はじめに 658
研究方法 658
善海『行信杞憂弁』について 659
円月『読行信杞憂弁』について 659
円月の行信論における善海の影響 660
おわりに 661 |
|---|
| ISSN | 00194344 (P); 18840051 (E) |
|---|
| DOI | 10.4259/ibk.65.2_658 |
|---|
| Hits | 62 |
|---|
| Created date | 2022.05.10 |
|---|
 |
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
