 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sophistry In and As Its Course |
|
|
|
| Author |
Liberman, Kenneth (著)
|
|---|
| Source |
Argumentation
|
|---|
| Volume | v.22 n.1 |
|---|
| Date | 2008 |
|---|
| Pages | 59 - 70 |
|---|
| Publisher | Springer |
|---|
| Publisher Url |
https://link.springer.com/
|
|---|
| Location | Dordrecht, the Netherlands [多德雷赫特, 荷蘭] |
|---|
| Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| Language | 英文=English |
|---|
| Keyword | Tibetan debating; Ethnomethodology; Sophistry; Philosophy |
|---|
| Abstract | Although sophistry has been characterized as separable from real philosophy, formal analysis does not work without it and one cannot always identify just where philosophy leaves off and sophistry begins. Whether sophistry offers anything to thinking reason has to do with what parties in dialogue do with sophistries. Sophistries can close down or open up philosophical perspectives, depending on the local work that sophistic strategies accomplish. Such local work of philosophers is rarely available to analyses of docile texts, but they can be furthered by ethnomethodological studies of illustrative philosophical argumentation presented and analyzed in videotaped format. |
|---|
| ISSN | 0920427X (P); 15728374 (E) |
|---|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10503-007-9070-y |
|---|
| Hits | 190 |
|---|
| Created date | 2022.05.10 |
|---|
| Modified date | 2022.05.10 |
|---|
 |
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
