|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Śrī Swāminārāyaṇ’s Position on Śabdapramāṇa and Śruti: Questions of Epistemic and Theological Validity |
|
|
|
| Author |
Bilimoria, Purushottama (著)
|
|---|
| Source |
Journal of Dharma Studies: Asian and Transcultural Religion, Philosophy, & Ethics
|
|---|
| Volume | v.1 n.1 |
|---|
| Date | 2018.10 |
|---|
| Pages | 45 - 67 |
|---|
| Publisher | Springer |
|---|
| Publisher Url |
https://www.springer.com/gp
|
|---|
| Location | Berlin, Germany [柏林, 德國] |
|---|
| Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| Language | 英文=English |
|---|
| Note | Authors and Affiliations: Graduate Theological Union, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA; UC Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, 94709, USA; School of Historical and Philosophical Studies, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia |
|---|
| Keyword | Swaminārāyaṇ; Sahajānand; Pramāṇa; Śabdapramāṇa; Śruti; Smṛti; Vachanāmrut; Vedānta; prasthāna-trayī; Śaṅkara; Rāmānuja; Apauruṣeya; Scriptural authority; Bhagawān; hermeneutics; Swaminarayan Sampradāya |
|---|
| Abstract | This paper argues that Śrī Swāminārāyaṇ espoused a position on the pramāṇa-s (means of knowing), and his theory was that among these it is śabdapramāṇa that is the important and authoritative pramāṇa. However, in delineating the precise sources and textual authority that fall within the ambit of śabdapramāṇa, he privileged mostly the Smṛti texts, along with Vedānta and Bhagavadgītā commentaries, to which was added later his own Gujarati text Vachanāmrut, as canonical texts of the particular Sampradāya. In so doing, he would be seen to be departing somewhat from classical positions on authoritative scriptures, in particular of Śaṅkara and, to an extent, Rāmānuja, for whom Śruti (‘revealed’) and Smṛti (‘recollected’) scriptures respectively denote quite different genre of texts, and with graded degree (rather kind) of authority; the former could even be apauruṣeya, authorless scriptures. The paper analyses the precise reasons for Swāminārāyaṇ arriving at this qualified position and the arguments he garnishes towards this doctrinal hermeneutic, concluding with comments on his slight departure from the classically accepted understanding of śabdapramāṇa where scriptural sources are the preeminent concern with a somewhat different epistemological trajectory. |
|---|
| ISSN | 25220926 (P); 25220934 (E) |
|---|
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1007/s42240-018-0014-4 |
|---|
| Hits | 207 |
|---|
| Created date | 2022.08.16 |
|---|
| Modified date | 2022.08.16 |
|---|
 |
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
|
|
