|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bring Back Harmony in Philosophical Discourse: a Confucian Perspective |
|
|
|
| Author |
Li, Chen-yang (著)
|
|---|
| Source |
Journal of Dharma Studies: Asian and Transcultural Religion, Philosophy, & Ethics
|
|---|
| Volume | v.2 n.2 |
|---|
| Date | 2020.03 |
|---|
| Pages | 163 - 173 |
|---|
| Publisher | Springer |
|---|
| Publisher Url |
https://www.springer.com/gp
|
|---|
| Location | Berlin, Germany [柏林, 德國] |
|---|
| Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| Language | 英文=English |
|---|
| Note | Authors and Affiliations: Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore |
|---|
| Keyword | Harmony; Confucianism; Plato; Cultural recourses; Equitable academy |
|---|
| Abstract | As both Chinese philosophy and Indian philosophy have been largely marginalized on the world stage of philosophy in contemporary times, there is a pressing need to bring these voices into the discourse of world philosophy. This essay explores the value of taking into account the Confucian idea of harmony for postcolonial solitary and for a more equitable polycentric global academy. I explicate the concept and the value of harmony as exemplified in Confucian philosophy. I examine reasons of the disappearance of harmony in dominant Western philosophical discourse by comparing various conceptions of harmony in the West. Greek philosophers Heraclitus, Pythagoras, and Plato presented competing conceptions of harmony; whereas Heraclitian processive harmony presupposes opposites, tension and conflict, Pythagorean harmony and Platonic harmony are founded on a pre-determined order. In the contemporary West, from Karl Popper to Martha Nussbaum, harmony has been treated with disdain while it is taken in a Platonic sense. In East Asia, both Confucianism and Daoism take harmony/harmonization as an effective way to accommodate diversity and difference. I will then focus on the Confucian dynamic notion of “harmony with difference” and argue that such a conception is far from naiveté and it has important implications if it is taken seriously in contemporary philosophical discourse. |
|---|
| ISSN | 25220926 (P); 25220934 (E) |
|---|
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1007/s42240-019-00047-w |
|---|
| Hits | 104 |
|---|
| Created date | 2022.08.25 |
|---|
| Modified date | 2022.08.25 |
|---|
 |
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
|
|
