Site mapAbout usConsultative CommitteeAsk LibrarianContributionCopyrightCitation GuidelineDonationHome        

CatalogAuthor AuthorityGoogle
Search engineFulltextScripturesLanguage LessonsLinks
 


Extra service
Tools
Export
本山版『正法眼蔵』の「異本」について:享和二年開版本を中心として=Variant Editions of the Honzanban-Shōbōgenzō 本山版正法眼蔵: Focusing on the 1802 Edition
Author 秋津秀彰 (著)=Akitsu, Hideaki (au.)
Source 印度學佛教學研究 =Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies=Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū
Volumev.68 n.1 (總號=n.149)
Date2019.12.20
Pages121 - 126
Publisher日本印度学仏教学会
Publisher Url http://www.jaibs.jp/
Location東京, 日本 [Tokyo, Japan]
Content type期刊論文=Journal Article
Language日文=Japanese
Keyword道元禅師; 本山版『正法眼蔵』; 定津院; 「謄写巻」
AbstractThis paper discusses the problem of the Tōsha-nomaki 謄写巻 in the Honzanban-Shōbōgenzō 本山版正法眼蔵, in an effort to provide a historical evaluation of the Tōsha-nomaki reproduced in the Jōshin-in-hon 定津院本.

The current official edition comprises 90 volumes reported in 1811, and 5 volumes of the Tōsha-nomaki published in 1906. The facsimile of the Tōsha-nomaki was originally determined to be reproduced at Eihei-ji 永平寺, but was additionally published in 1906.

As originally planned in 1802, there is a variant edition of the Tōsha-nomaki. The 1802 edition may be found at Eihei-ji and Jōshin-in 定津院. The Jōshin-in-hon was used as a manuscript draft by the editor Sodō-Ontatsu 祖道穏達. It is notable for being a copied version of the entire Tōsha-nomaki, that was not believed to exist.

First, I consider the Western-style book published by Ōuchi Seiran 大内青巒 in 1885 with regard to the Tōsha-nomaki published before 1906. The results suggest that no book for copying purposes actually existed at Eihei-ji. This deduction is made on the basis that Ontatsu also intended to publish the Tōsha-nomaki. Further, I compare the Jōshin-in-hon, Ōuchi-hon 大内本, and 1906 versions of the Tōsha-nomaki. In so doing, I clarify that the Ōuchi-hon was the source text for the 1906 edition and that the Jōshin-in-hon was unrelated to the other two editions.

Based on the above-mentioned reasons, I conclude that the Tōsha-nomaki in the Jōshin-in-hon edited by Ontatsu is the legitimate official version of the text, and that the 1906 edition is a variant edition, if the 1811 edition of the Jōshin-in-hon is considered.
Table of contents一 問題の所在と研究の目的 121
二「謄写巻」諸本の成立と『原本』の存在問題 122
三 大内本・明治本の参照資料と享和本等との比較 124
四 「謄写巻」諸本の本文・校異の比較 124
五 本稿の結論と今後の課題 126
ISSN00194344 (P); 18840051 (E)
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.4259/ibk.68.1_121
Hits74
Created date2022.09.22
Modified date2022.09.22



Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE

Notice

You are leaving our website for The full text resources provided by the above database or electronic journals may not be displayed due to the domain restrictions or fee-charging download problems.

Record correction

Please delete and correct directly in the form below, and click "Apply" at the bottom.
(When receiving your information, we will check and correct the mistake as soon as possible.)

Serial No.
649579

Search History (Only show 10 bibliography limited)
Search Criteria Field Codes
Search CriteriaBrowse