Site mapAbout usConsultative CommitteeAsk LibrarianContributionCopyrightCitation GuidelineDonationHome        

CatalogAuthor AuthorityGoogle
Search engineFulltextScripturesLanguage LessonsLinks
 


Extra service
Tools
Export
倶舎論における非伝説句の立場:総縁法念住の内容を巡って=The Situation of the Non-kila Sentence in the AKBh: On the Dharmasmṛtyupasthāna
Author 田中裕成 (著)=Tanaka, Hironori (au.)
Source 印度學佛教學研究 =Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies=Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū
Volumev.68 n.1 (總號=n.149)
Date2019.12.20
Pages439 - 435
Publisher日本印度学仏教学会
Publisher Url http://www.jaibs.jp/
Location東京, 日本 [Tokyo, Japan]
Content type期刊論文=Journal Article
Language日文=Japanese
Keyword非伝説句; 説一切有部; 四念住; 四善根; 順決択分; 加行
AbstractIn the commonly accepted theory of the Abhidharmakośabhāṣya (AKBh) texts, in sentences containing kila Vasubandhu indicates his disagreement, and in sentences without kila Vasubandhu show the understanding of the ordinary Vaibhāṣika in Kashmir (Kaśimīra Vaibhāṣika). This article questions that conventional understanding.

The phenomena of mindfulness (dharmasmṛtyupasthāna) in the AKBh appears in a sentence without kila, yet was supplemented in the *Nyāyānusāra (NyA. Chi. Shun zhengli lun 順正理論). This is because the sentence was incomplete for the Vaibhāsika of Kashmir. Therefore, the *Tattvārtha (TA) cites and is supplemented by the NyA, and the *Lakṣanānusāriṇī (LA) cites and is supplemented by the Abhidharmadīpa. In other words, the TA and LA considered the AKBh imperfect from the standpoint of the Kashmir Vaibhāṣika. On the other hand, the Abhidharmakośavyākhyā (AKVy) did not consider it incomplete or in need of supplement, because the AKVy was not Kashmir Vaibhāṣika, but Sautrāntika.

I believe this difference derives from whether respect was given to the *Jñānaprasthāna (JñPr. Chi. Fazhi lun 発智論) or sūtra. The seven points and three contemplations (trividhārthaparīkṣa and saptasthānakauśala) were not explained in the AKBh because it was modified by the JñPr. Kashmir Vaibhāṣika respected the JñPr, but Sautrāntika would not accept an alteration by the JñPr.
Table of contents1.はじめに 439
2.『倶舎論』非伝説句としての総縁法念住説 439
3.『倶舎論』の非伝説句に対する『順正理論』の立場 438
4.『倶舎論』非伝説句に対する諸注釈書の見解 437
5.まとめ 436
ISSN00194344 (P); 18840051 (E)
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.4259/ibk.68.1_439
Hits190
Created date2022.09.23
Modified date2022.09.23



Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE

Notice

You are leaving our website for The full text resources provided by the above database or electronic journals may not be displayed due to the domain restrictions or fee-charging download problems.

Record correction

Please delete and correct directly in the form below, and click "Apply" at the bottom.
(When receiving your information, we will check and correct the mistake as soon as possible.)

Serial No.
649679

Search History (Only show 10 bibliography limited)
Search Criteria Field Codes
Search CriteriaBrowse