|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
三一権実論争における元興寺智光の位置=The Historical Position of Gango-ji Chikō 元興寺智光 in the Controversy between the Three Vehicles and One Vehicle Theories |
|
|
|
Author |
小野嶋祥雄 (著)=Onoshima, Sachio (au.)
|
Source |
印度學佛教學研究 =Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies=Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū
|
Volume | v.68 n.2 (總號=n.150) |
Date | 2020.03.20 |
Pages | 700 - 704 |
Publisher | 日本印度学仏教学会 |
Publisher Url |
http://www.jaibs.jp/
|
Location | 東京, 日本 [Tokyo, Japan] |
Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
Language | 日文=Japanese |
Keyword | 空有の論争; 三一権実論争; 元興寺智光; 『般若心経述義』; 『浄名玄論略述』; 『法華玄論略述』 |
Abstract | Chikō (智光, 708–776?) of the Gango-ji (元興寺) is known as the greatest monk of the Sanron (三論) sect during the Nara period. Attention has been paid to his criticism of the Hossō (法相) sect’s three period teaching classification (三時教判) in the context of the debate regarding emptiness and existence (空有諍論).
In this study, I show that Chikō’s Jōmyō genron ryakujutsu (浄名玄論略述) quotes the early Tang Chinese monk Fabao’s (法宝) Yisheng foxing jiujinglun (一乗仏性究竟論), which is famous for criticizing the three vehicle theory.
In addition, I point out that Chikō’s Jōmyō genron ryakujutsu criticizes the Hossō distinction of the five natures (五性各別) in the context of controversy between the Three Vehicles and One Vehicle theories.
From this, I conclude that Chikō’s Jōmyō genron ryakujutsu was written from the standpoint of criticizing the Three Vehicles theory. |
Table of contents | 一 問題の所在 700 二 空有の論争と元興寺智光 700 三 報仏の常・無常と元興寺智光 701 四 三一権実論争における元興寺智光の位置 702 結語 703 |
ISSN | 00194344 (P); 18840051 (E) |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.4259/ibk.68.2_700 |
Hits | 225 |
Created date | 2022.09.26 |
Modified date | 2022.09.26 |
|
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
|
|