|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
善導と懐感の師弟説に関する一考察:村地説の検討を通して=The Master-Disciple Relationship of Shandao 善導 and Huaigan 懐感: An Examination of Murachi’s Theory |
|
|
|
Author |
榎屋達也 (著)=Enokiya, Tatsuya (au.)
|
Source |
印度學佛教學研究 =Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies=Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū
|
Volume | v.68 n.2 (總號=n.150) |
Date | 2020.03.20 |
Pages | 750 - 754 |
Publisher | 日本印度学仏教学会 |
Publisher Url |
http://www.jaibs.jp/
|
Location | 東京, 日本 [Tokyo, Japan] |
Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
Language | 日文=Japanese |
Keyword | 善導; 懐感; 師弟関係; 凡夫入報 |
Abstract | Huaigan 懐感 has long been considered a disciple of Shandao 善導, the master largely responsible for the formulation of Chinese Pure Land teachings. Murachi Tetsumyō 村地哲明, however, has questioned this traditional understanding and suggested they had no such relationship. In this paper, I examine Murachi’s theory to reevaluate the relationship between Shandao and Huaigan.
Murachi’s study focuses on differences in the doctrinal understandings of Pure Land thought between Shandao and Huaigan. He maintains that Huaigan could not have been a disciple of Shandao based on these differences. But since they clearly shared the idea that the attainment of birth in the True-Reward land by ordinary beings (凡夫入報) is the primary doctrinal concern of the Pure Land teaching, I argue that differences regarding other points are not a serious obstacle to consider that Huaigan was a disciple of Shandao.
As Murachi points out, it is an undeniable fact that there are many differences between Shandao’s and Huaigan’s doctrinal understandings. However, the existence of differences on some points does not provide sufficient proof to completely reject the possibility of their master-disciple relationship, particularly when they agree on other major points of doctrine. |
Table of contents | 一 問題の所在 750 二 伝記史料に対する検討 751 三 思想的異同について 751 四 小結 753 |
ISSN | 00194344 (P); 18840051 (E) |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.4259/ibk.68.2_750 |
Hits | 136 |
Created date | 2022.09.27 |
Modified date | 2022.09.27 |
|
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
|
|