Site mapAbout usConsultative CommitteeAsk LibrarianContributionCopyrightCitation GuidelineDonationHome        

CatalogAuthor AuthorityGoogle
Search engineFulltextScripturesLanguage LessonsLinks
 


Extra service
Tools
Export
初期佛敎における肉食の肯定=Affirmation of meat eating in early Buddhism
Author 岩井昌悟 (著)=Iwai, Shogo (au.)
Source 불교학보=佛教學報
Volumev.50 n.0
Date2008.12
Pages51 - 76
Publisher동국대학교 불교문화연구원=Institute for Buddhist Culture
Publisher Url https://abc.dongguk.edu/kbri/
LocationKorea [韓國]
Content type期刊論文=Journal Article
Language日文=Japanese
Note著者所属:日本 東洋大學 教授
Keywordmeat eating; early Buddhism; vegetable diet; Sam jong jeong yuk(三種淨肉; practicing mind; karma; notseeing; not hearing; not suspicious
AbstractThis study explores an issue of meat-eating in early Buddhism based on materials about Buddhism in South Asia. The tendency to consider a vegetable diet as an ideal diet was already burgeoning in Indian society even when Sakyamuni was alive. Early Buddhism, however, permitted a meat diet. It can be interpreted as the early Buddhism ‘permitted meat-eating boldly’ against the social atmosphere of the time. Although it taught people not to kill anything and to have mercy on everything, early Buddhism allowed a meat diet under the condition called ‘Sam-jong-jeong-yuk’ that identified three conditions for a meat diet: if people do not see the scene of slaughtering animals; if people do not hear the fact of slaughtering animals; if people are not suspicious of animals slaughtered to be served for them. Early Buddhism has the following logics for permitting a meat diet. First, Buddhism disagrees with asceticism because an ascetic life itself is meaningless unless it accompanies practicing mind. A vegetable diet was one of practicing methods of asceticism. Even though not eating meat is practiced as a way of asceticism, it is meaningless without practicing mind as well. In other words, the more important thing is the mind when you eat something rather than what you eat. Second, non-Buddhists argue that those who eat meat bear the karma of the persons who killed animals, so a meat diet should be forbidden. However, Sakyamuni thought that if people eat meat considered as pure meat in accordance with three conditions of not seeing, not hearing and not suspicious, they do not bear the karma because they do not have the will of killing life.
Table of contentsI 問題の所在 52
II 「生臭」(āmagandha)の意味の轉換 54
III 苦行の項目としての不食肉 58
IV 三種淨肉とpaticcakamma 65
V 結語 71
ISSN12261386 (P)
Hits67
Created date2022.10.18
Modified date2022.10.18



Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE

Notice

You are leaving our website for The full text resources provided by the above database or electronic journals may not be displayed due to the domain restrictions or fee-charging download problems.

Record correction

Please delete and correct directly in the form below, and click "Apply" at the bottom.
(When receiving your information, we will check and correct the mistake as soon as possible.)

Serial No.
652000

Search History (Only show 10 bibliography limited)
Search Criteria Field Codes
Search CriteriaBrowse