|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
中西哲學會通之「格義」與「逆格義」方法論的探討－以牟宗三先生的康德學與中國哲學研究爲例=An Inquiry into the Methodology of "Analogical Interpretation" and "Reverse Analogical Interpretation" in the process of the Integration of Chinese and Western Philosophy-Centered on Prof. Mou Tsung-s |
|
|
|
| Author |
林安梧 (著)=Lin, An-wu (au.)
|
|---|
| Source |
淡江中文學報=Tamkang Journal of Chinese Literature
|
|---|
| Volume | n.15 |
|---|
| Date | 2006.12.01 |
|---|
| Pages | 95 - 116 |
|---|
| Publisher | 淡江大學中文系 |
|---|
| Location | 臺北縣, 臺灣 [Taipei hsien, Taiwan] |
|---|
| Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| Language | 中文=Chinese |
|---|
| Note | 林安梧，臺灣師範大學國文學系教授。 |
|---|
| Keyword | 對比=comparison; 轉化=transformation; 闡釋=elucidation; 一心開二門=Mahayanasraddhotpada (TwoGates-in-One-Mind); 方法論=methodology; 詮釋學=Hermeneutics |
|---|
| Abstract | 本論文將對牟宗三於康德學的詮釋、吸收、融攝、批判與轉化的創造，提出一反思與檢討。集中的焦點在於「現象」與「物自身」的超越區分之理解詮釋，一方面闡明牟先生是如何在「逆格義」的中西哲學交涉過程裡，經由康德學來融攝這對概念，又如何的轉化，而有嶄新的創造，締造為「一心開二門」式的「無執」與「執」的存有論。全文將以牟先生的《現象與物自身》對比於康德學，做文獻的深層闡釋，並宏觀對比於中西哲學型態學之異同，而進一步對此中所造成概念的位移、滑轉、融通、銷解、重組，提出批評。再者，在這過程中，可以試圖做一後設的反思，去省察中國哲學方法論所涉的相關問題。
This paper focuses on Prof. Mou Tsung-san’s interpretation, reception, elimination, critique and transformative creation of Kant’s Philosophy. Firstly, it discusses transcendental division between “Phenomenon and Thing-in-Itself”. On the one hand, it points out that, in the process of the integration of Chinese and Western philosophy, Mou received these two concepts through his critical absorption of Kant’s philosophy in the way of “reverse analogical interpretation”; on the other, it indicates the approach that Mou made the Ontology of “Non-attachment” and “Attachment” of “Mahayanasraddhotpada” (Two-Gates-in-One-Mind) kind through the transformative creation of the two concepts.
Based on the comparison with Mou’s “Phenomenon and Thing- in- Itself” and Kant’s philosophy, it will elucidate the deep meaning of text and investigate the difference between Chinese and Western philosophy, then discuss the displacement, distortion, assimilation, melting, and reconstruction, resulted from Mou’s reverse analogical interpretation, of concepts. Finally, it shows that, the meta- reflection and investigation on the methodology of Chinese Philosophy and problems related could be made in this inquiry. |
|---|
| Table of contents | 提要 95
一、關於「格義」與「逆格義」的相關對比 96
二、從「現象」與「物自身」的超越區分到「兩層存有論」 99
三、關於「智的直覺」及其相關之問題 101
四、關於「存有的連續觀」與「存有的斷裂觀」之對比 102
五、「主體」通極於「道體」與既「超越」而「內在」 103
六、「表象」、「現象」與「見乃謂之象」 104
七、「象在形先」、「形乃謂之器」 與「存有三態論」之可能構造 106
八、「古典漢語」、「生活話語」 與「學術話語」的「兩端而一致」論 109
九、感言 110
主要參考及引用文獻 111
Abstract 115 |
|---|
| ISSN | 18197469 (P) |
|---|
| DOI | 10.6187/tkujcl.201712_(37).0007 |
|---|
| Hits | 315 |
|---|
| Created date | 2022.10.24 |
|---|
| Modified date | 2022.10.24 |
|---|
 |
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
|
|
