 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
‘Visions of the Buddha’: A Critical Reply |
|
|
|
| Author |
Bhikkhu Anālayo (著)
|
|---|
| Source |
Journal of the Centre for Buddhist Studies, Sri Lanka
|
|---|
| Volume | v.18 |
|---|
| Date | 2021 |
|---|
| Pages | 1 - 36 |
|---|
| Publisher | 香港佛法中心有限公司=Buddha-Dharma Centre of Hong Kong Ltd.(BDCHK) |
|---|
| Publisher Url |
http://buddhadharma.co/
|
|---|
| Location | 香港, 中國 [Hong Kong, China] |
|---|
| Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| Language | 英文=English |
|---|
| Abstract | This article presents a critical evaluation of the approach to early
Buddhist oral tradition proposed by Eviatar Shulman in Visions of the
Buddha: Creative Dimensions of Early Buddhist Scripture (2021b),
extracts of which appeared soon afterwards in an article titled “The Play
of Formulas in the Early Buddhist Discourses” (2021a) |
|---|
| Table of contents | Introduction
The Play of Formulas
Formulas as Independent Textual Elements
The Four Mahāpadesas
Comparative Study and Historicism
A Proper Appreciation of Comparative Studies
Comparative Studies and Literary Dimensions of the Texts
The Notion of Parallelism
Study Confined to Pāli Texts
Conclusion
Abbreviations
References
Notes |
|---|
| ISSN | 13918443 (P) |
|---|
| Hits | 187 |
|---|
| Created date | 2022.11.28 |
|---|
| Modified date | 2022.11.28 |
|---|
 |
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
