|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
On conflicting religious truth–claims |
|
|
|
| Author |
Hick, John (著)
|
|---|
| Source |
Religious Studies
|
|---|
| Volume | v.19 n.4 |
|---|
| Date | 1983.12 |
|---|
| Pages | 485 - 491 |
|---|
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press |
|---|
| Publisher Url |
https://www.cambridge.org/
|
|---|
| Location | Cambridge, UK [劍橋, 英國] |
|---|
| Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| Language | 英文=English |
|---|
| Abstract | In their article ‘On Grading Religions, Seeking Truth, and Being Nice to People’ (Religious Studies, XIX, 75–80) Paul Griffiths and Delmas Lewis present my view of the relation between the world religions as a ‘nonjudgmental inclusivism’ which, in the interests of harmony and goodwill, denies that the different religions make conflicting truth–claims. Indeed, according to Griffiths and Lewis, I deny that they make any truth–claims at all. Thus ‘since the apparently incompatible truth–claims found in the world's major religious systems are not in fact truth–claims at all, there can be no incompatibility between them’ (p. 76). And so no arguments arise and we can all be nice to each other! |
|---|
| ISSN | 00344125 (P); 1469901X (E) |
|---|
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412500015511 |
|---|
| Hits | 131 |
|---|
| Created date | 2023.03.08 |
|---|
| Modified date | 2023.03.08 |
|---|
 |
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
|
|
