|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Are Ethnocentric/Nationalist Buddhists Engaged Buddhists? Certainly Not. |
|
|
|
| Author |
King, Sallie B. (著)
|
|---|
| Source |
Journal of Buddhist Ethics
|
|---|
| Volume | v.30 |
|---|
| Date | 2023 |
|---|
| Pages | 83 - 92 |
|---|
| Publisher | Department of History & Religious Studies Program , The Pennsylvania State University |
|---|
| Publisher Url |
https://history.la.psu.edu/
|
|---|
| Location | University Park, PA, US |
|---|
| Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| Language | 英文=English |
|---|
| Keyword | ahimsa; engaged Buddhism; human rights; Myanmar; Sri Lanka |
|---|
| Abstract | This is a brief response to Donna Lynn Brown’s article, “Beyond Queen and King: Democratizing ‘Engaged Buddhism’,” (Journal of Buddhist Ethics Vol. 30, 2023) and indirectly to others who have argued that ethnocentric and/or
nationalist Buddhism could be a part of Engaged Buddhism. To this question, I will argue that this is not possible. Secondarily, I take up the question of the “oneness” of Engaged Buddhism. |
|---|
| Table of contents | Abstract 83
Works Cited 91 |
|---|
| ISSN | 10769005 (E) |
|---|
| Hits | 154 |
|---|
| Created date | 2023.05.26 |
|---|
| Modified date | 2023.05.29 |
|---|
|
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
|
|
