|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soteriological Mereology in the Pāli Discourses, Buddhaghosa, and Huayan Buddhism |
|
|
|
| Author |
Jones, Nicholaos (著)
|
|---|
| Source |
Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy
|
|---|
| Volume | v.22 n.1 |
|---|
| Date | 2023.03 |
|---|
| Pages | 117 - 143 |
|---|
| Publisher | Springer Science & Business Media B.V. |
|---|
| Publisher Url |
http://www.springer.com/gp/
|
|---|
| Location | Dordrecht, the Netherlands [多德雷赫特, 荷蘭] |
|---|
| Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| Language | 英文=English |
|---|
| Keyword | Attachment; Inclusion; Resolution of the compact; Net of Indra; No-self |
|---|
| Abstract | Extant discussions of Buddhist mereology give minimal attention to the soteriological significance of denying the reality of wholes. This is unfortunate, because the connection between mereology and soteriological is both significant and problematic. The connection is significant, because it supports an argument for the unreality of composite wholes that does not depend upon any claim about the nature of wholes. The connection is also problematic, because some Buddhists endorse the soteriological relevance of mereology despite admitting that composite wholes are real. I address these issues by reviewing early Pāli Buddhist attitudes toward the soteriological significance of mereology, developing an argument for the unreality of wholes from the work of Buddhaghosa, and explicating an alternative approach from the Chinese tradition of Huayan 華嚴 Buddhism that calls into question some common assumptions about parts and wholes. |
|---|
| ISSN | 15403009 (P); 15697274 (E) |
|---|
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-022-09869-1 |
|---|
| Hits | 82 |
|---|
| Created date | 2023.06.27 |
|---|
| Modified date | 2023.06.27 |
|---|
 |
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
|
|
