|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
A Central Asian Buddhist Term: Remarks on Khotanese saña- and Tocharian B sāñ, A ṣāñ |
|
|
|
| Author |
Del Tomba, Alessandro (著)
;
Maggi, Mauro (著)
|
|---|
| Source |
Indo-Iranian Journal
|
|---|
| Volume | v.64 n.3 |
|---|
| Date | 2021.07 |
|---|
| Pages | 199 - 240 |
|---|
| Publisher | Brill |
|---|
| Publisher Url |
http://www.brill.com/
|
|---|
| Location | Leiden, the Netherlands [萊登, 荷蘭] |
|---|
| Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| Language | 英文=English |
|---|
| Note | 1. Alessandro Del Tomba
Università degli Studi di Roma La Sapienza Italy Rome
2. Mauro Maggi
Università degli Studi di Roma La Sapienza Italy Rome |
|---|
| Keyword | Khotanese; Tocharian; Gāndhārī; language contact; saṃjñā; upāya |
|---|
| Abstract | The Khotanese masculine substantive saña- ‘artifice, expedient, means, method’ cannot be a loanword from the Gāndhārī feminine saṃña ‘perception, idea’ (< Sanskrit saṃjñā-), as has been recently suggested. Bilingual evidence for its meaning, its metrical use, and the contexts where it occurs show unambiguously that it differs formally and semantically from the Khotanese feminine saṃñā- ‘idea, notion, perception, etc.’, the actual loanword from Gāndhārī saṃña. Since the meaning of Tocharian B sāñ, ṣāñ and A ṣāñ ‘expedient, means’ agrees with that of Khotanese saña- ‘artifice etc.’, the old view should not be abandoned that the latter is a genuine Khotanese word < Iranian *sćandi̯a- (to the root *sćand- ‘to appear, seem (good)’) and is the source of the corresponding loanwords in Tocharian. |
|---|
| ISSN | 00197246 (P); 15728536 (E) |
|---|
| DOI | 10.1163/15728536-06402002 |
|---|
| Hits | 237 |
|---|
| Created date | 2023.07.11 |
|---|
| Modified date | 2023.07.13 |
|---|
 |
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
|
|
