Site mapAbout usConsultative CommitteeAsk LibrarianContributionCopyrightCitation GuidelineDonationHome        

CatalogAuthor AuthorityGoogle
Search engineFulltextScripturesLanguage LessonsLinks
 


Extra service
Tools
Export
中國天主教與戒殺放生── 以《丙寅(1686 年)會課》為例=Chinese Christianity and Buddhist Life Release: Research on the Teaching Sessions in 1686
Author 梅謙立 (著) ; 王琦 (著)
Source 佛光學報=Fo Guang Journal of Buddhist Studies
Volumen.2 新9卷
Date2023.07
Pages1 - 84
Publisher佛光大學佛教研究中心
Publisher Url https://cbs.fgu.edu.tw/
Location宜蘭縣, 臺灣 [I-lan hsien, Taiwan]
Content type期刊論文=Journal Article
Language中文=Chinese
Note梅謙立,中山大學(廣州)哲學系教授。
王琦,中山大學(廣州)哲學系博士生。
Keyword天主教教育=Catholic education; 人文主義=humanism; 耶穌會=Jesuits; 戒殺放生=Buddhist life release
Abstract我們先前已在本刊撰文介紹 1686 年南京天主教十六位學生所撰寫 的作業《丙寅會課》,並分析他們在那一年正月關於佛教齋戒的討論, 說明十六份作業主要是從儒家經典出發,討論的內容試圖表現出佛教的 思想違背儒家,而天主教則與儒家一致。本文介紹《丙寅會課》中三月 份所撰寫的關於戒殺放生的學生作業,首先回顧蓮池袾宏(1535-1615) 與天主教徒之間的碰撞,此後分析這十六份作業如何使用儒家資源駁斥 佛教,說明這些學生對佛法本身並沒有很深入的理解。文末以《丙寅會 課》作為附錄,讀者可以看到十六份作業全文及詳細註釋。

In a previous issue of this journal, we presented the Teaching Sessions in 1686 as the written assignments by sixteen Catholic students in Nanjing. We analyzed their discussions about Buddhist fasting held in the first month of that year, explaining that their assignments were mostly based on Confucian classics and intended to show that Buddhism conflicts with Confucianism while Christianity aligns with it. This paper presents the assignments from the third month of the Teaching Sessions in 1686, which were concerned with the Buddhist prohibition of killing and the release of captive animals (life release). We first review the collision between Zhuhong (袾宏, 1535-1615) and the Catholics, and then analyze how the sixteen assignments used Confucian resources to refute Buddhism, revealing their limited understanding of Buddhism itself. The full text of the sixteen assignments, along with detailed notes, can be found in the appendix.
Table of contents摘要 1
引論 3
一、明清社會中的戒殺放生思想與實踐 4
二、明清佛耶二家關於戒殺放生的文字衝突 9
三、明清佛耶二家關於戒殺放生的社會衝突 16
四、從佛耶之辨到儒佛之辨 19
五、古聖賢殺生以行孝道和祭祀 22
六、古聖賢把人的利益置於動物之上 26
七、戒殺放生的功利主義違背儒家 29
八、戒殺放生在實踐上的矛盾 31
九、以儒耶綜合的慈善事業代替戒殺放生 36
結論 37
引用書目 40
附錄 1:《三月會課:放生戒殺》 44
附錄 2:李之藻與放生會的衝突 79
ISSN24143006 (P)
Hits153
Created date2023.08.02
Modified date2023.08.02



Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE

Notice

You are leaving our website for The full text resources provided by the above database or electronic journals may not be displayed due to the domain restrictions or fee-charging download problems.

Record correction

Please delete and correct directly in the form below, and click "Apply" at the bottom.
(When receiving your information, we will check and correct the mistake as soon as possible.)

Serial No.
678355

Search History (Only show 10 bibliography limited)
Search Criteria Field Codes
Search CriteriaBrowse