|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
南朝宋文明《道德義淵．自然道性》論述契機及其詮釋=The Discourse Opportunity and interpretation of Zirandaoxing in Daodeyiyuan by Song Wenming in Southern Dynasties |
|
|
|
| Author |
劉鐔靖 =Liu,Tan-Ching
|
|---|
| Source |
臺灣宗教研究=Taiwan Journal of Religious Studies
|
|---|
| Volume | v.22 n.1 |
|---|
| Date | 2023.06 |
|---|
| Pages | 177 - 214 |
|---|
| Publisher | 台灣宗教學會=Taiwan Association for Religious Studies |
|---|
| Location | 臺北市, 臺灣 [Taipei shih, Taiwan] |
|---|
| Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| Language | 中文=Chinese |
|---|
| Keyword | 《道德義淵》=profound of the Daode jing(Daode yiyuan); 〈自然道性〉=spontaneous Dao-nature(ziran Daoxing); 道性自然=spontaneity of Dao-nature(Daoxing ziran); 〈立神明成佛義記〉=Meaningful Record on the Establishment of the Spiritual Brillance to become a Buddha(Lishenming chengfo yiji); 宋文明=Song Wenming |
|---|
| Abstract | 《道德經》「道法自然」、《河上公注》「道性自然」、陸修靜「自然因緣」、宋文明「自然道性」發展脈絡歷來為學者關注，並認為宋文明《道德義淵．自然道性》延續陸修靜舊說，置入道教文獻「道性」發展的脈絡。回顧學者成果，並未論述其成立契機。本文認為《道德義淵》應有其特定的論述契機與創意，或與神滅論爭後的漣漪—梁武帝〈立神明成佛義記〉相關，將由以下證成前述並論其創發：（一）探討「自然道性」的論述契機；（二）以《道德義淵．自然道性》探討宋文明的「道性」詮釋；（三）以「道教內部文獻的引用」、「體例的傳承與論述系統的差異」兩個視角論述作為敦煌寫本文獻系統《道德義淵》於道教內部系統的兩個意涵。
The development context of "the Dao as spontaneity" (Dao De Jing), "DaoxingZiran" (the Ho-shang Kung Commentaries), "Ziran causation shuo" ( Lu Xiu Jing ) and "Zirandaoxing" (Song Wen Ming) had been a topic of concern for scholars.Looking back on the scholar's achievements. Based on the Song Wenming "Zirandaoxing" (Daodeyiyuan), this article put the development of Daoist literature into the development of Daoism. It didn't not discuss the opportunity for its establishment. perhaps, it can be assumed that "Daodeyiyuan" should have its specific discussion opportunity and originality. This article believes that it may be related to "Li Shenming Cheng Fo Yi Ji" (Emperor Wu of the Liang Dynasty), which would be proved by the following and discuss its creation: (1) The opportunity of discussing "Zirandaoxing", (2) Based on "Zirandaoxing" to explore the interpretation of "Dao Xing" by Song Wen Ming ; (3) Discuss the two meanings of the Dunhuang manuscript system "Daodeyiyuan" in the internal system of Daoism from the two perspectives of "quotation of internal Daoist literature" and "inheritance of styles and differences in discourse system". |
|---|
| Table of contents | 一、前言 178
二、宋文明「自然道性」的論述契機 180
（一）陸修靜因應「佛性說」成立〈自然因緣說〉（佚）180
（二）另一場論爭：神滅論爭的「佛性」漣漪 184
三、宋文明的「自然道性」詮釋 190
（一）立基《河注》釋「道法自然」（《道德經》）以述「道性」191
（二）建構「道性」與「善」的關係 194
（三）「通有」、「迴變」與「一切含識皆有道性」的提出 196
四、於道教內部系統的兩個意涵 199
（一）道教內部文獻的引用 200
（二）「道性」論述系統的差異與體例的傳承 202
五、結論 204
參考書目 207
|
|---|
| ISSN | 20769458 (P) |
|---|
| Hits | 77 |
|---|
| Created date | 2023.10.18 |
|---|
| Modified date | 2023.10.23 |
|---|
 |
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
|
|
