|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
「天竺之路」與「天臺之路」：中國佛教的抉擇——兼談玄奘在中國佛教中地位=Chinese Buddhism Has Adhered to the Line of Zhi- yi rather than Xuan- zang |
|
|
|
| Author |
陳堅 (著)=Chen, Jian (au.)
|
|---|
| Source |
遼寧大學學報 (哲學社會科學版)=Journal of Liaoning University (Philosophy and Social Science Edition)
|
|---|
| Volume | v.38 n.5 |
|---|
| Date | 2010.09 |
|---|
| Pages | 53 - 60 |
|---|
| Publisher | 遼寧大學 |
|---|
| Publisher Url |
http://www.lnu.edu.cn/index.jsp
|
|---|
| Location | 瀋陽, 中國 [Shenyang, China] |
|---|
| Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| Language | 中文=Chinese |
|---|
| Note | 陳堅，浙江臨海人，哲學博士，山東大學哲學系教授，博士生導師。研究方向：佛教與宗教學。 |
|---|
| Keyword | 中國佛教=Chinese Buddhism; 玄奘=Xu-zang; 智顗=Zhi-yi; 天竺之路=the way to India; 天臺之路=the way to Tian-tai |
|---|
| Abstract | 作為中國佛教史上的兩位偉大僧人，玄奘和智顗分別走了兩條截然不同的佛教道路，其中玄奘走的是"天竺之路"，他遠赴印度取經學習並最終成為印度佛教唯識學專家和佛經翻譯家，而智顗走的則是"天臺之路"，他來到天臺山隱修以尋求適合中國人的佛教解脫法門並最終創立了中國佛教史上第一個中國化的佛教宗派天臺宗。與玄奘只是照搬印度佛學而毫無創新形成鮮明對照的是，智顗表現出了佛學上的巨大創造力，開啟了中國佛教創造自身中國化模式的大幕。中國佛教正是在選擇智顗模式而拋棄玄奘模式的基礎上逐步形成自己的獨特風格並發展壯大的。從這個意義上來說，玄奘對於中國佛教的重要性還遠不如智顗，盡管玄奘比智顗更具知名度。
As two great monks in the history of Chinese Buddhism, Xuan-zang and Zhi-yi developed different styles in their respective Buddhist practice: while the former went to India to study Indian Buddhism, finally becoming an expert in learning of Vij?ānamatravāda and a translator of Sūtra, the latter practised as a hermit in Tian -tai mountain located in eastern China seashore to seek a religious way suited to Chinese people, finally establishing Tian-tai sect, the first Chinese-style Buddhist sect. Zhi-yi displayed great creative power in Chinese Buddhism , yet Xuan-zang only copied Indian Buddhism mechanically. It is by following Zhi-yi’s style not Xuan-zang’s style that Chinese Buddhism expands itself unceasingly. In this sense, we say that Zhiyi is more important than Xuan-zang in Chinese Buddhism, though Xuan-zang is known to more people than Zhi-yi. |
|---|
| Table of contents | 引言 53
一、玄奘的“天竺之路” 54
二、智顗的“天臺之路” 56
三、中國佛教的抉擇 59
參考文獻 60 |
|---|
| ISSN | 10023291 (P) |
|---|
| Hits | 6 |
|---|
| Created date | 2023.11.21 |
|---|
| Modified date | 2023.11.21 |
|---|
 |
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
|
|
