 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
漢譯佛典中的「梵志」是梵漢合璧詞嗎？=Is fanzhi (梵志) a combined Chinese-Sanskrit word? |
|
|
|
| Author |
姜南 (著)=Jiang, Nan (au.)
|
|---|
| Source |
中國語文=Chinese language
|
|---|
| Volume | n.5 (總號=n.362) |
|---|
| Date | 2014 |
|---|
| Pages | 448 - 453, 480 |
|---|
| Publisher | 人民教育出版社 |
|---|
| Publisher Url |
http://www.pep.com.cn/
|
|---|
| Location | 北京, 中國 [Beijing, China] |
|---|
| Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| Language | 中文=Chinese |
|---|
| Keyword | 早期漢譯佛典=the early Chinese-translated Buddhist Scriptures; 梵志=fanzhi; 音譯=transliteration; 意譯=free translation |
|---|
| Abstract | "梵志"與"婆羅門"同義，都是伴隨佛經翻譯從印度傳入的專有名詞。但是相對"婆羅門"一目了然的音譯詞身份，"梵志"的真實屬性卻含糊不清，將它視為半音半意梵漢合璧詞的普遍看法存在明顯漏洞，恐難成立。本文試以古代注釋中的分歧解讀和早期譯經語言研究的最新成果——犍陀羅語假說，重新考察"梵志"的來歷，認為它是來自中期印度語的音譯詞。
As a pair of synonyms in the Chinese-translated Buddhist Scriptures poluomen (婆羅門) is a transliteration undoubtedly, while the origin of fanzhi (梵志) still remains ambiguous. This paper questions a common opinion that it is a combined Chinese-Sanskrit word. Based on the comments to the ancient annotations and new researches on the early Buddhist Scriptures, the paper argues that fanzhi is a transliteration from the Middle Indic. |
|---|
| Table of contents | 1. 古代注釋中的分歧解讀 448
2. 轉向早期譯經的語言事實 450
3. 來自犍陀羅語的直接證據 452
4. 餘論 453 |
|---|
| ISSN | 05781949 (P) |
|---|
| Hits | 5 |
|---|
| Created date | 2024.03.08 |
|---|
| Modified date | 2024.03.08 |
|---|
 |
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
