|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buddhism, Medicine, and the Affairs of the Heart: Āyurvedic Potency Therapy (Vājīkarana) and the Reappraisal of Aphrodisiacs and Love Philters in Medieval Chinese Sources |
|
|
|
| Author |
Steavu, Dominic (著)
|
|---|
| Source |
East Asian Science, Technology, and Medicine
|
|---|
| Volume | v.45 |
|---|
| Date | 2017 |
|---|
| Pages | 9 - 48 |
|---|
| Publisher | Brill |
|---|
| Publisher Url |
http://www.brill.nl/
|
|---|
| Location | Leiden, the Netherlands [萊登, 荷蘭] |
|---|
| Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| Language | 英文=English |
|---|
| Note | Author Affiliation: University of California Santa Barbara, USA. |
|---|
| Abstract | This article examines how discursive frames modify forms of knowledge and practice. More precisely, it considers the problem of categories in early and medieval Chinese sources through the lens of recipes designed to facilitate intercourse. In pre-Buddhist Chinese sources, such prescriptions traditionally fell either under the rubric of ‘nourishing life’ (yangsheng 養生) longevity practices or spellbinding (zhuzu 祝詛). While recipes that appear in the former bracket—referred to in this study as ‘aphrodisiacs’—were couched in a discourse of healing and classified as a medical undertaking, those associated with spellbinding—referred to as ‘love philters’—were filed under the heading of mantic arts and divination in bibliographic treatises. With the arrival of Āyurvedic medicine in China via Buddhist sources, this partition grew increasingly blurred. Āyurvedic medical taxonomy in general, and its discipline of potency therapy (vājīkarana) in particular, did not distinguish between aphrodisiacs and love philters since both ultimately facilitate intercourse, albeit through different means. The imprint of Āyurvedic categories in China can be ascertained in Buddhist manuscript sources from Dunhuang, but also, more surprisingly, in widely circulated medieval non-Buddhist medical treatises. However, in contrast to the emblematic medical treatises of the middle period and surveyed manuscript Buddhist materials, canonical Buddhist texts appear to have shied away from the topic of aphrodisiacs and upheld the indigenous Chinese understanding of love philters as spellbinding and mantic art. |
|---|
| Table of contents | Abstract 9
Introduction 10
The Problem of Non-Indigenous Categories 11
On Indigenous Chinese Categories: the Arts of the Bedchamber and the Way of Seduction 14
Chinese Buddhism and Āyurvedic Medicine 18
Reasserting Indigenous Categories in Non-Medical Non-Buddhist Sources from Dunhuang 23
Challenging Native Categories in Medical Non-Buddhist and Buddhist Sources from Dunhuang 26
Challenging Native Categories in Medical Non-Buddhist Sources Beyond Dunhuang 28
Aphrodisiacs and Love Philters in Medieval Chinese Buddhist Canonical Texts 32
Concluding Discussion 38
References 42
Pre-Modern Works in Eastern Asian Languages 42
Secondary Sources in Western and Eastern Languages 43 |
|---|
| ISSN | 1562918X (P) |
|---|
| Hits | 81 |
|---|
| Created date | 2024.03.13 |
|---|
| Modified date | 2024.03.13 |
|---|
 |
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
|
|
