Site mapAbout usConsultative CommitteeAsk LibrarianContributionCopyrightCitation GuidelineDonationHome        

CatalogAuthor AuthorityGoogle
Search engineFulltextScripturesLanguage LessonsLinks
 


Extra service
Tools
Export
Beyond Conventional Existence and Fundamental Emptiness: Kuiji’s Logical Analysis of Bhāviveka’s Two Inferences for the Emptiness of All Dharmas
Author Brewster, Ernest (著)
Source Journal of the Oxford Centre for Buddhist Studies
Volumev.23 Summer
Date2023
PublisherOxford Centre for Buddhist Studies
Publisher Url https://www.wolfson.ox.ac.uk/how-get-here
LocationOxford, UK [牛津, 英國]
Content type期刊論文=Journal Article
Language英文=English
AbstractDuring the sixth century CE, Bhāviveka (c. 500–560 CE), the South Asian Buddhist philosopher, enlisted the ‘three-part inference’ (Sanskrit, hereafter, Skt.: trairūpya; Chinese, hereafter, Chi.: sanzhi zuofa 三支作法), a form of logical reasoning based in the ‘science of reasons’ (Skt.: hetuvidyā; Chi.: yinming 因明) to expound the Madhyamaka doctrine of the ‘emptiness’ (Skt.: śūnyatā; Chi.: kongxing 空性) of all dharmas, the fundamental constituents making up the entirety of reality. In the Jewel in the Palm of the Hand (Skt.: *Hastaratna; Chi.: Zhangzhen lun 掌珍論), a seminal Madhyamaka treatise preserved only in the seventh-century CE Chinese translation by Xuanzang (602?– 664), Bhāviveka formulated two inferences intending to prove that all ‘conditioned dharmas’ (Skt.: saṃskṛtadharmāḥ; Chi.: youwei fa 有爲 法) and ‘unconditioned dharmas’ (Skt.: asaṃskṛtadharmāḥ; Chi.: wuwei fa 無爲法) are universally empty, in terms of ‘ultimate truth’ (Skt.: paramārthasatya; Chi.: shengyi di 勝義諦). This paper examines how Kuiji 窺基 (632–682), an eminent Sinitic scholar-monk, puts pressure on Bhāviveka’s inferences by contending that they erroneously attribute the property of omnipresent emptiness to all conditioned and all unconditioned dharmas. In his rejoinder to Bhāviveka’s two inferences, Kuiji hews closely to the doctrinal sources of Yogācāra Buddhism in which ‘reality as it really is’ (Skt.: *tattva; Chi.: zhenshi 真 實) is characterised by an ‘ultimately real nature’ (Skt.: *dravyatva; Chi.: zhenshi 實性) that is unconditioned, neither arising, nor ceasing, and neither conventionally existent, nor fundamentally empty.
ISSN20471076 (P)
Hits14
Created date2024.04.26
Modified date2024.05.02



Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE

Notice

You are leaving our website for The full text resources provided by the above database or electronic journals may not be displayed due to the domain restrictions or fee-charging download problems.

Record correction

Please delete and correct directly in the form below, and click "Apply" at the bottom.
(When receiving your information, we will check and correct the mistake as soon as possible.)

Serial No.
697510

Search History (Only show 10 bibliography limited)
Search Criteria Field Codes
Search CriteriaBrowse