Site mapAbout usConsultative CommitteeAsk LibrarianContributionCopyrightCitation GuidelineDonationHome        

CatalogAuthor AuthorityGoogle
Search engineFulltextScripturesLanguage LessonsLinks
 


Extra service
Tools
Export
佐々木閑氏の奇妙な反論=The Quirks of Sasaki Shizuka’s Critique: A Critical Examination
Author 藤本晃 (著)=Fujimoto, Akira (au.)
Source 印度學佛教學研究 =Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies=Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū
Volumev.72 n.1 (總號=n.161)
Date2023.12.20
Pages436 - 429
Publisher日本印度学仏教学会
Publisher Url http://www.jaibs.jp/
Location東京, 日本 [Tokyo, Japan]
Content type期刊論文=Journal Article
Language日文=Japanese
Keyword律; 破僧; 破法輪; 破羯磨; 佐々木閑
AbstractIn 2022, Fujimoto pointed out issues with Sasaki’s (2000) interpretations of the definition of saṅghabheda (dissension and break among the saṅgha; schism). In response, Sasaki (2022) replied to these criticisms, merely reiterating his two original arguments.

Argument 1: There are two distinct definitions for saṅghabheda; cakrabheda (dissension and break by/related to breaking Śākyamuni Buddha’s teachings) and karmabheda (dissention and break related to disrupting the saṅgha’s activities).

Argument 2: The definition of cakrabheda was altered to that of karmabheda during the reign of Emperor Aśoka.

On Argument 1: Sasaki confuses definition and incidents. The Vinaya describes two distinct incidents that resulted in saṅghabheda. One is associated with Devadatta and is referred to as cakrabheda, while the other, known as karmabheda, involves the bhikkhus in Kosambi.

It is essential to note that neither cakrabheda nor karmabheda can be considered the precise definition of saṅghabheda; instead, they represent particular incidents.

On Argument 2: It may be reasonable to argue that definitions can evolve over time. However, it is not the case that two distinct incidents (cakrabheda and karmabheda) transitioned from one into the other as time passed.
Table of contents1.はじめに 436
2.破法輪と破羯磨は破僧の「定義」ではなく事例 436
3.破羯磨とはなにか 435
4.破法輪とはなにか 434
5.事例は二つ,定義は一つ 434
6.デーヴァダッタとコーサンビーを明記する文献 433
7.破僧の事例は変更できない 433
8.唯一の破僧定義が二つの条件を必要とする 432
9.佐々木の反論は何をどう間違えているのか 431
10.佐々木は本当は何か気づいていたかもしれない 430
11.おわりに――先達に教えを請うべし―― 429
〈参考文献〉 429
ISSN00194344 (P); 18840051 (E)
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.4259/ibk.72.1_436
Hits40
Created date2025.01.10
Modified date2025.01.17



Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE

Notice

You are leaving our website for The full text resources provided by the above database or electronic journals may not be displayed due to the domain restrictions or fee-charging download problems.

Record correction

Please delete and correct directly in the form below, and click "Apply" at the bottom.
(When receiving your information, we will check and correct the mistake as soon as possible.)

Serial No.
707507

Search History (Only show 10 bibliography limited)
Search Criteria Field Codes
Search CriteriaBrowse