|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
パーリ文法家モッガラーナの聖典引用=Grammatical Analysis of Canonical Examples in the Moggallānavyākaraṇa |
|
|
|
| Author |
矢崎長潤 (著)=Yazaki, Chojun (au.)
|
|---|
| Source |
印度學佛教學研究 =Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies=Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū
|
|---|
| Volume | v.72 n.1 (總號=n.161) |
|---|
| Date | 2023.12.20 |
|---|
| Pages | 476 - 472 |
|---|
| Publisher | 日本印度学仏教学会 |
|---|
| Publisher Url |
http://www.jaibs.jp/
|
|---|
| Location | 東京, 日本 [Tokyo, Japan] |
|---|
| Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| Language | 日文=Japanese |
|---|
| Note | （令和5年度科学研究費［研究番号22KJ2321］による研究成果の一部） |
|---|
| Keyword | パーリ文法; チャンドラゴーミン; Moggallānavyākaraṇa; Candragomin |
|---|
| Abstract | As a sequel to Yazaki （2022）, this study identifies the sources of certain canonical Pāli examples offered in the Moggallānavyākaraṇa and examines the reasons why its author, Moggallāna （ca. twelfth century）, provided them in his grammar. It is worth observing that unlike the Kaccāyanavyākaraṇa （ca. seventh–eighth century）, Moggallāna takes into account grammatical interpretations found in the Aṭṭhakathās, although he does not always refer to all of them.
1. In M 2.3 （kāladdhānam accantasaṃyoge）, Moggallāna presents three canonical examples, namely, pubbanhasamayaṃ nivāsetvā “having dressed in the morning time” （Vinaya III, p. 62）, ekaṃ samayaṃ Bhagavā “at one time the Exalted one,” and imaṃ rattiṃ cattāro Mahārājā “in this night the Four Great Kings” （Dīghanikāya I, p. 14; III, p. 2065）. In the second example, ekaṃ samayaṃ, the second nominal case ending is introduced after the word samaya, whereas in Sanskrit it is generally read ekasmin samaye with the seventh nominal case ending. In this connection, Moggallāna offers two interpretations, which can be traced back to those observed in Buddhaghosa’s Sumaṅgalavilāsinī （I, p. 333–32）.
2. In M 2.9 （dhyādīhi yuttā）, Moggallāna provides four canonical examples, namely, dhir atthu maṃ pūtikāyaṃ “Shame on my rotten body” （Jātaka II, p. 43719）, antarā ca Rājagaham antarā ca Nāḷandaṃ “between Rājagaha and Nālanda” （Dīghanikāya I, p. 14–5）, samādhānam antarena “without concentration” （Udāna-aṭṭhakathā p. 16 note 2）, and Mucalindam abhito saram “around Mucalinda lake” （cf. Jātaka VI, p. 5367）. Although Buddhaghosa provides an interpretation of the repeated use of antarā in the second example, Moggallāna does not delve into this matter. |
|---|
| Table of contents | 1．問題の所在 476
2．ekaṃ samayaṃ に対する二つの解釈 476
3．ブッダゴーサの解釈とモッガラーナへの影響 475
4．ブッダゴーサの解釈に言及しない事例 474
5．結論 473
〈一次文献および略号〉 472
〈二次文献〉 472 |
|---|
| ISSN | 00194344 (P); 18840051 (E) |
|---|
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.4259/ibk.72.1_476 |
|---|
| Hits | 26 |
|---|
| Created date | 2025.01.10 |
|---|
| Modified date | 2025.01.17 |
|---|
 |
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
|
|
