|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| Author |
白金銑 (著)=Pai, Chin-hsien (au.)
|
|---|
| Source |
正觀雜誌=Satyabhisamaya: A Buddhist Studies Quarterly
|
|---|
| Volume | n.45 |
|---|
| Date | 2008.06.25 |
|---|
| Pages | 187 - 235 |
|---|
| Publisher | 正觀雜誌社 |
|---|
| Publisher Url |
http://www.tt034.org.tw/
|
|---|
| Location | 南投縣, 臺灣 [Nantou hsien, Taiwan] |
|---|
| Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| Language | 中文=Chinese |
|---|
| Note | 作者為國立臺灣師範大學國文所博士班候選人 |
|---|
| Keyword | 水懺=Buddhist Water-confession ritual; 水懺序=The Preface of Buddhist Water-confession ritual; 以水洗瘡=washing an ulcer with water; 洗心懺悔; 袁盎=Yuan Young; 晁錯=Tsao Tsou; 三昧法水=Samadhi Buddha-truth water |
|---|
| Abstract | 本文透過敦煌文獻、佛教文獻與人物史傳，處理學界佛教界對《水懺》與＜水懺序＞間一直混淆不清的三個問題。其一，《水懺》的主體內容，早在六世紀時已含備在敦煌本二十卷《佛名經》中，並不是＜水懺序＞中所說的唐代悟達國師(知玄，811~933A.D.)所撰。其二，《水懺》的主體內容(三障懺悔文字)是印度大乗佛教「以水洗瘡」的緣起療心之懺悔譬喻，其根本方法是眾生須以緣起的「慈悲心力」、「悲喜心水」進行懺悔，不是依賴＜水懺序＞中迦諾迦尊者的「三昧法水」。其三，《水懺》與＜水懺序＞其實是兩篇截然不同、各自獨立的懺悔文字，不可勉強合一。亦即，六世紀時的《水懺》，不等於十五世紀神異化後的《三昧水懺》，若勉強將二法合一，即將嚴重誤解古德撰寫《水懺》之初衷。
In this paper, the three questions consistently confused between "Buddhist Water-confession Ritual"in the academic and Buddhist sectors have been handled through Tun Huang literature, Buddhist literature and historical/biograghic data. The first one is that, the main content of "Buddhist Water-confession Ritual" had been included in Vol. 20, Tun Huang version(Buddha Name Sutra) in the 6th century rather than as said by "The Preface of Buddhist Water-confession ritual" that is was written by BUddhist leader Wu Ta(CHin Hsuan, 811~833A.D.) during Tang dynasty. The second one is that, the main content of "Buddhist Water-confession ritual"(three-obstacle confession text) was a confession metephor of origin mind therapy-"washing an ulcer with water" in the Mahayana of India, which suggested the fundamental method for the sentient beings to confess should use the origin-related "mind power of mercy", "compassion-joy water of mind" instead of relying on "Samadhi Buddha-truth water of the reverend Cha No Ka in "The Preface of Buddhist Water-confession ritual". The third one is that, in fact "Buddhist Water-confession ritual" and "The Preface of Buddhist Water-confession ritual" are totally different texts of confession independently from each other, not allowed to be combined in one reluctantly. That is to say, "Buddhist Water-confession ritual" in the 6th century is not equal to "Samadhi Water-confession Ritual" after the 15th century. The motif of the ancint master who wrote "Buddhist Water-confession ritual" will be seriously misunderstood if if the two rituals were combined reluctantly. |
|---|
| Table of contents | 一、導言 187
二、「水懺」與「水懺序」的關係三論 196
三、結語 225
參考書目 227
|
|---|
| ISSN | 16099575 (P) |
|---|
| Hits | 2506 |
|---|
| Created date | 2008.07.11 |
|---|
| Modified date | 2017.09.05 |
|---|
 |
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
|
|
