Site mapAbout usConsultative CommitteeAsk LibrarianContributionCopyrightCitation GuidelineDonationHome        

CatalogAuthor AuthorityGoogle
Search engineFulltextScripturesLanguage LessonsLinks
 


Extra service
Tools
Export
Gorampa on the Objects of Negation: Arguments for Negating Conventional Truths
Author Sonam Thakchoe
Source Contemporary Buddhism: An Interdisciplinary Journal
Volumev.9 n.2
Date2008.11
Pages265 - 280
PublisherRoutledge
Publisher Url https://www.routledge.com/
LocationAbingdon, UK [阿賓登, 英國]
Content type期刊論文=Journal Article
Language英文=English
KeywordNegation (Logic); Philosophical Analysis; Buddhist Philosophy; Buddhist Ethics; Consciousness
AbstractIn this paper I explore Gorampa's conception of the objects of negation. My primary aim is to show that, in Gorampa's conception of the objects of negation, negating the extreme existent (bhava/yod pa)—the first of the tetralemma (catu s ko t i/mtha' bzhi)—entails negating the conventional realities qua truths themselves. The paper first identifies Gorampa's notions of the objects of negation soteriogically and epistemically, and second it considers Gorampa's arguments defending his treatment of truths (bden pa) as the objects of negation. The chief arguments Gorampa employs for negating the truths (by way of eliminating the extreme of existence) can be summarised as follows: that all things are conceptually reified elaborations (spros pa), the Prasa n gika is committed to the transcendent of all spros pa; that all entities are false as they all fail to reveal their reality when they are subjected to logical analysis; that an enlightened consciousness does not verify the existence of truths; that there is no commonly agreed appearance that can be taken as a common basis for the debate between the Buddhist reificationist and the Prasa n gika Mdhyamikas; that truths are the catalysts for driving ignorance through conceptual graspings to truths; that grasping to truths obstructs a seeker from attaining the enlightenment; and finally that seeing things as dependently arisen amounts to seeing nothing at all.
Table of contentsIntroduction 265
Identifying the objects of negation 266
Arguments 271
Conclusion 276
Notes 277
References 280
ISSN14639947 (P); 14767953 (E)
DOI10.1080/14639940802556594
Hits467
Created date2009.03.06
Modified date2017.06.28



Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE

Notice

You are leaving our website for The full text resources provided by the above database or electronic journals may not be displayed due to the domain restrictions or fee-charging download problems.

Record correction

Please delete and correct directly in the form below, and click "Apply" at the bottom.
(When receiving your information, we will check and correct the mistake as soon as possible.)

Serial No.
173276

Search History (Only show 10 bibliography limited)
Search Criteria Field Codes
Search CriteriaBrowse