|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
阿賴耶識、真如空性與如來藏心 ── 大乘唯識學與如來藏思想辨微=Alaya-Vijnana,Bhutatathata-Shunyata and Tathagata-Garbha: Discrimination Between Vidya-Matra-Shastra and Tathagata-Garbha Theory |
|
|
|
Author |
吳可為 (著)=Wu, Ke-wei (au.)
|
Source |
上海大學學報 (社會科學版)=Journal of Shanghai University
|
Volume | n.4 |
Date | 2007.07 |
Pages | 64 - 70 |
Publisher | 上海大學期刊社 |
Publisher Url |
http://www.jpsu.shu.edu.cn
|
Location | 上海, 中國 [Shanghai, China] |
Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
Language | 中文=Chinese |
Note | 作者單位:浙江社會科學院哲學所 |
Keyword | 唯識=vij饩ānamātra; 如來藏=Tathagata-garbha; 空性=shunyata; 阿賴耶釋=alaya-vijnana |
Abstract | 如來藏概念相應於印度如來藏思想的三個發展階段,可以區分為佛性如來藏、空性如來藏與識性如來藏三種不同而又有著本質關聯的意義,其中識性如來藏與唯識學之間有著密切的關聯。如來藏思想根本不存在所謂實體化傾向,它與唯識學的主要區別乃是解釋學的原則和角度之不同。正是基於這一區別,識性如來藏與唯識雖然同樣以第八識為依止,卻開演成兩種有重大區別的理論體系。同時,也由於兩者之區別的根源只是解釋學和方法論上的,則這兩種看似正相對立的思想體系之間倒正隱含著一種建設性的互補關系。
The connotation of Tathagata-garbha can be, corresponding to the three phases of Indian Tathagata-Garbha theory,divided into three different,inter-related parts,that is,Buddhist nature,immaterial nature and intelligent nature,among which,Tathagata-garbha of intelligent nature is closely related to Vij饩ānamātra studies.The theory of Tathagata-garbha does not at all possess the tendency to the so-called substantialization.And the chief difference between it and vij饩ānamātra studies lies in the different princ... |
ISSN | 10076522 (P); 10076522 (E) |
Hits | 828 |
Created date | 2009.03.17 |
Modified date | 2019.12.24 |
|
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
|
|