|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
從詮釋學方法看儒、道對佛教心性思想的影響=On the Influence of Confucianism and Taoism on Buddhist Inwardness Ideology from the Angle of Hermeneutics |
|
|
|
| Author |
李曉婧 (著)=Li, Xiao-jing (au.)
;
楊維中 (著)=Yang, Wei-zhong (au.)
|
|---|
| Source |
徐州工程學院學報 (社會科學版)=Xuzhou Institute of Technology
|
|---|
| Volume | v.22 n.1 |
|---|
| Date | 2007.01 |
|---|
| Pages | 28 - 33 |
|---|
| Publisher | 徐州工程學院 |
|---|
| Publisher Url |
http://www.xzit.edu.cn/
|
|---|
| Location | 徐州, 中國 [Xuzhou, China] |
|---|
| Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| Language | 中文=Chinese |
|---|
| Note | 作者單位：南京大學 |
|---|
| Keyword | 詮釋學方法=Hermeneutics; 儒家思想=Confucianism; 道家思想=Taoism; 佛教心性思想=Buddhist inwardness ideology |
|---|
| Abstract | 中國佛教心性論的形成和發展確實受到了儒、道、玄學等思想的影響，而且這種影響愈往後愈隱蔽、愈內在。因此，它們只能作為中國佛學所面臨的「前理解」和「效果歷史」而起作用，真正起決定性作用的是作為「詮釋對象」的印度佛學。隋唐佛教諸宗在創立自己的心性思想時，面對的最大既定「詮釋視域」就是儒家的人本主義和道家「道體論」、玄學本體論，而將二者的內在意蘊統一於佛學的性空之理和「如來藏自性清凈心」之上，就成為中國化佛教諸宗以所謂「真常心」為特徵的心性本體論。隋唐諸宗大師正是在「前理解”和「效果歷史」內在化的背景下，達到了充分的「視域融合」，因而才建構出與儒學、道家、玄學不同的心性思想體系。
The foundation and development of Chinese Buddhist inwardness theory was really influenced by the Confucianism, Taoism and metaphysics to some extent and this influence became more and more intrinsic and unnoticeable in the following years. But, in fact, it was the Indian Buddhism that played the decisive role while the Confucianism, Taoism and metaphysics just served as the pre-understanding and the historical roles. The great Buddhists in Sui and Tang dynasties theorized Chinese inwardness ontology on the basis of Confucian humanism, Taoism and substantialism of metaphysics in the background of internalization. This fully integration made Chinese Buddhism the unique system compared to the other ideologies. |
|---|
| ISSN | 16730704 (P) |
|---|
| Hits | 876 |
|---|
| Created date | 2009.07.01 |
|---|
| Modified date | 2020.04.16 |
|---|
 |
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
|
|
