|
|
|
|
Author |
成中英 (著)=Cheng, Chung-ying (au.)
|
Source |
中華佛學學報=Chung-Hwa Buddhist Journal=Journal of Chinese Buddhist Studies
|
Volume | n.3 |
Date | 1990.04 |
Pages | 185 - 208 |
Publisher | 中華佛學研究所=Chung-Hwa Institute of Buddhist Studies |
Publisher Url |
http://www.chibs.edu.tw/publication_tw.php?id=12
|
Location | 新北市, 臺灣 [New Taipei City, Taiwan] |
Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
Language | 中文=Chinese; 英文=English |
Keyword | 禪宗=Zen Buddhism=Zazen Buddhism; 公案; 邏輯; 語意學; 存有論 |
Abstract | 禪宗公案,究竟是邏輯,還是詭辯? 吾人至少可以提出 三點禪之詭辯論的事實. 難怪強調概念清晰,邏輯一致,暨 語意上求其有意義的現代哲學家,會把「禪」神祕化; 也難 怪以某種理論來詮釋宗教經驗暨宗教語言的現代宗教哲學家 ,認為禪宗經驗及語言最令人匪夷所思.
為要消解這些疑惑,本文特別論究公案之邏輯,及其 在語意學上之意義; 並澄清其方法論暨存有論之基礎. 本文 主想討論有關公案所引生的疑惑,暨禪之詭辯性兩個基本 問題:如何以邏輯合理方式來衍生出有意義層面而作為彰顯 或達到終於真理的工具? 如何合理的解釋這些疑惑暨詭論? 邏輯上又如何解釋?
吾人對這些問題的答案,主是根據對禪之疑惑暨詭 論之深度分析. 我們指出禪宗悟者把公案之表面語意與其深 一層存有論的指涉二者之關係予以打破,使表面意義的語言 失去了本身存有論中的指涉者; 因此,同一禪語言能形成有 新的表面語意的語言形式,而其本體之指涉仍不變,亦即其 本體指涉者沒特定的指涉對象.
前者形成了所謂「本體無承諾原則」; 後者則精成「意 義呈現 (重組) 原則」,本文許多論點不外乎是此二原則的 詮解,相信將能使吾人對禪之語言及其疑惑暨詭辯論有進一 步合理的瞭解.
When a ch'an Buddhist speaks of kung-an ("open case"),he is using a form of paradoxical language in which laws of logic are contradicted and common- rules of understanding are defied. This form of language is usually a dialogue or a problem-posing- and-disposing between a ch'an master and his disciple seeking wu (enlightenment). How is this form of language understood? Can we avoid calling it "illogical" and "unintelligble"? Can we give it a logical and rational explanation and justification and thus bring out its own logicality? Furthermore, can we enlighten the attainment of wu in light of logic and reason? In this paper I made the effort and attempt to explain and justify the use of kung-an as a matter of logical and referential transformation. The following two principles are specifically formulated and proposed for this explanatory and justificatory purpose:the principle of ontological non-commitment and the principle of contextual reconstitution. |
ISSN | 10177132 (P) |
Hits | 1284 |
Created date | 1998.07.22
|
Modified date | 2017.06.15 |
|
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|