![](en/images/title/Title_FulltextSearch.gif) |
|
|
|
Author |
冉雲華 (著)=Jan, Yun-hua (au.)
|
Source |
中華佛學學報=Chung-Hwa Buddhist Journal=Journal of Chinese Buddhist Studies
|
Volume | n.1 |
Date | 1987.03 |
Pages | 43 - 57 |
Publisher | 中華佛學研究所=Chung-Hwa Institute of Buddhist Studies |
Publisher Url |
http://www.chibs.edu.tw/publication_tw.php?id=12
|
Location | 新北市, 臺灣 [New Taipei City, Taiwan] |
Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
Language | 中文=Chinese; 英文=English |
Keyword | 宗密; 禪宗=Zen Buddhism=Zazen Buddhism; 神會; 胡適 |
Abstract | 胡適先生去世以後,他尚未完成的一篇遺作在中央研究 院歷史語言研究所集刊上出版. 胡氏在那篇遺著中說唐代僧 人和思想家宗密所傳的傳法世系是不可靠的. 根據胡氏所考 ,宗密應是四川淨眾寺神會 (俗姓石) 一系的僧人. 他又 否定宗密所言他是荷澤大師神會 (俗姓高) 法裔的說法. 並 且指責宗密是「有意錯認祖師」,「捏造歷史,攀龍附鳳」 ,目的在抬高自己的身分. 本文把胡氏的證據,再加檢討, 發現胡氏的結論不能完全成立. 本文考察的結果認為宗密所 傳的禪法,應是荷澤一系的傳統. 宗密的祖師南印唯忠, 兼承荷澤,淨眾兩家法旨,因此才造成混亂. 胡氏對宗密的 指責,證據不足,不能成立.
During the later years of his life,Professor Hu Shih (1891-1962) continued his interest in the study of Ch'an Buddhist histories. One of his unfinished essays was an examination of the lineage of Ch'an Buddhism which was posthumously published in 1962. Hu suspects that Tsung-mi(780-841) has intentionally falsified his lineage by claiming Shen-hui (684-758) as his spiritual ancestor. Hu contends that the Shen-hui actually was the Shen-hui (720-794) of Ching-chung temple,which belonged to the Northern school of Ch'an. Hu further contends that Tsung-mi has misidentified these two persons in order to falsify and glorify the Ch'an lineage for his own personal advantage. During the last twenty-five years, Hu's view gradually gain ground among recent research of Ch'an. This paper reexamines Hu's con- tention as well as his sources. The paper points out Hu's difficulty and disproves his contention. Based on Hu's own contradiction and new materials the study proves that there is no concrete evidence to prove the accounts given by Tsung-mi are un- reliable as Hu has suspected. |
ISSN | 10177132 (P) |
Hits | 1178 |
Created date | 1998.07.22
|
Modified date | 2017.06.15 |
![](en/images/logo/bg-btn-edit.png)
|
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|