 |
|
|
|
|
| Author |
李志夫
|
|---|
| Source |
中華佛學學報=Chung-Hwa Buddhist Journal=Journal of Chinese Buddhist Studies
|
|---|
| Volume | n.1 |
|---|
| Date | 1987.03 |
|---|
| Pages | 245 - 279 |
|---|
| Publisher | 中華佛學研究所=Chung-Hwa Institute of Buddhist Studies |
|---|
| Publisher Url |
http://www.chibs.edu.tw/publication_tw.php?id=12
|
|---|
| Location | 新北市, 臺灣 [New Taipei City, Taiwan] |
|---|
| Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| Language | 中文=Chinese; 英文=English |
|---|
| Keyword | 印度哲學; 六師外道; 印度佛教=Indian Buddhism |
|---|
| Abstract | 佛教文獻中所指之「六師外道」，在印度非佛教文獻中
都稱之為「六師」. 他們本身沒正式文獻留傳，有之只是
與其對立，批判其學說，斷章取義的片段而已. 就是佛教經
典所載六師思想非但取捨不同，且互有矛盾，互相取代等錯
綜問題. 後人隨取一經之六師思想，加以斥責宣說，即以訛
傳訛，相去益遠. 是以有必要加以比較，分析，期能指出六
師之本來思想.
六師可說是薄伽梵歌，數論非吠陀文化之「婊親」; 也
是反吠陀者加爾瓦卡，耆那教，佛教之「遠親」或先軀者.
尤其對佛教，無論在正，反兩方面，都是具影響的.
The "Six Teachers" of ancient India whom
Buddhist texts refer to as "`tirthikas` "did not
themselves hand down any scriptures. What-we know of
their teachings comes from distorting fragments in
the works of their opponents in which their theories
are subjected to criticism. As to the relevant
Buddhist text materials, they differ in content and
are aften contradictory. Later scholars would
confine themselves to the statements of a single
sutra and criticize the theories of the "Six
Teachers". Yet this amounted only to corrupting even
further already twisted information. It is therefore
necessary to compare and analyze the pertinent
materials in order to reconstruct the original
thought of the "Six Teachers". We might say that the
"Six Teachers" are closely related to the non-Vedic
Indian culture of the `Bhagavadgita` and `Samkhya` ,
and are distant relations or forerunners of the
anti-Vedic Carvakas, Jainas, and Buddhists. Their
influence on Buddhism in the positive as well as the
negative sense is highly evident. |
|---|
| ISSN | 10177132 (P) |
|---|
| Hits | 1305 |
|---|
| Created date | 1998.07.22
|
|---|
| Modified date | 2017.06.15 |
|---|
 |
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
