Site mapAbout usConsultative CommitteeAsk LibrarianContributionCopyrightCitation GuidelineDonationHome        

CatalogAuthor AuthorityGoogle
Search engineFulltextScripturesLanguage LessonsMuseumLinks
 
Bookmark and Share


Extra service
Tools
Export
The Imperial Law and the Buddhist Law
Author Kuroda, Toshio ; Stone, Jacqueline I.
Source Japanese Journal of Religious Studies
Volumev.23 n.3-4
Date1996
Pages271 - 285
PublisherNanzan Institute for Religion and Culture=南山宗教文化研究所
Publisher Url http://nirc.nanzan-u.ac.jp/en/
Location名古屋, 日本 [Nagoya, Japan]
Content type期刊論文=Journal Article
Language英文=English
NoteThis article is a translation of Kuroda Toshio’s "Obo to buppo" (1983,pp. 8-22; 1994, pp. 185-96.)
[Translator’s note: I have followed Neil McMullin (1984) in translating the key terms in this essay, obo and buppo, as “imperial law” and “Buddhist law,” respectively. All footnotes have been provided by the translator. Subheaders have been added by the editors.
KeywordDHARMA (BUDDHISM); LAW AND RELIGION; POLITICS AND BUDDHISM; JAPAN--HISTORY--TO 1333
AbstractBuddhism has often been regarded in purely intellectual or spiritual terms. However, especially in its institutional dimensions, Buddhism like other religious traditions has been closely associated with political authority, and to ignore this is to distort its history. To begin redressing scholarly neglect of this subject, the late Kuroda Toshio explores in this article the paired concepts of the obo (imperial law) and the buppo (Buddhist law) as an interpretive framework for investigating Buddhism's political role in the Japanese historical context. The doctrine of the mutual dependence of the imperial law and the Buddhist law (obo buppo sdiron) emerged toward
the latter part of the eleventh century, in connection with the development of the estate system (shoen seido) of land tenure. As powerful landholders, the major temple-shrlne complexes of Japan's early medieval period constituted a political force that periodically challenged the authority of the emperor, the court, and the leading warrior houses, but on the other hand cooperated with these influential parties in a system of shared rule. Thi system actively involved Buddhist institutions in maintenance of the status quo and was criticized in various ways by the leaders of the Kamakura new Buddhist movements, who asserted that the buppo should transcend worldly authority. However, such criticisms were never fully implemented, and after the medieval period, Buddhism came increasingly under the domination of central governing powers. The relationship of Buddhism to political authority is a troubling problem in Japanese history and remains unresolved to this day.
ISSN03041042 (P)
Hits960
Created date1998.04.28
Modified date2017.08.25



Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE

Notice

You are leaving our website for The full text resources provided by the above database or electronic journals may not be displayed due to the domain restrictions or fee-charging download problems.

Record correction

Please delete and correct directly in the form below, and click "Apply" at the bottom.
(When receiving your information, we will check and correct the mistake as soon as possible.)

Serial No.
333379

Search History (Only show 10 bibliography limited)
Search Criteria Field Codes
Search CriteriaBrowse