|
|
|
|
|
|
刊本大藏經之入藏問題初探=A Preliminary Study on the Question of Which Texts Were Incorporated in the Blockprint Edition of the Tripitaka |
|
|
|
Author |
藍吉富 (著)=Lan, Chi-fu (au.)
|
Source |
中華佛學學報=Chung-Hwa Buddhist Journal=Journal of Chinese Buddhist Studies
|
Volume | n.13.1 |
Date | 2000.05 |
Pages | 167 - 178 |
Publisher | 中華佛學研究所=Chung-Hwa Institute of Buddhist Studies |
Publisher Url |
http://www.chibs.edu.tw/publication_tw.php?id=12
|
Location | 新北市, 臺灣 [New Taipei City, Taiwan] |
Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
Language | 中文=Chinese; 英文=English |
Note | n.13.1為第13期卷上‧中文篇 |
Keyword | 入藏; 大藏經; 二十五種藏經目錄對照考釋; Inclusion in Tripitaka; Tripitaka; Comparative Annotation of the Catalog of 25 Kindsof Tripitaka |
Abstract | 本文所擬探討的是下列幾項問題: l.自宋迄清,各種大藏經的核心內容是什麼? 2. 這些大藏經的人藏標準是什麼?它們的標準合理嗎?換 句話說,被收入大藏經中的佛典都是重要的嗎?是否曾 有重要佛典被遺漏而未入藏? 3. 當代傳世最廣的《大正藏》,在收錄佛典方面具什麼 特色?《大正藏》對入藏問題的處理,超越古代其他大藏 經的地方是那些?
Summary This paper examines following problems: 1. What are the core contents of various versions of Tripitaka from Song to Qing Dynasties. 2. What are the criteria of compiling these versions of Tripitaka? Are their criteria reasonable? In other words, are the Buddhist sutras compiled into the Tripitaka the important ones? Are there any important Buddhist sutras not compiled into the Tripitaka? 3. Taisho Tripitaka is the most popular Tripitaka nowadays. What are its characteristics in compilation? In the treatment of compilation,What are the specialities of Taisho Tripitaka superior to other old Tripitakas?
|
Table of contents | 一. 前言 二. 基本文獻 -- 印度佛典 (一)印度佛典之漢譯本,是刊本大藏經的基本內容 (二)宋清間諸藏所收印度佛典數量,並不全然一致 三. 宋清間中國著述之入藏情形 (一)中國著述入藏數量之逐漸增多 (二)名僧傳記的入藏情形 (三)各宗名著的入藏比例並不一致,有甚多要典在宋清間 並未入藏 四. 宋清間大藏經之入藏情形的檢討 (一)訪書不週,蒐書不全,以致要籍未能入藏 (二)其書在中國已佚(或甚為難覓),然仍保存於域外 (三)對密教類文獻的不盡相容 (四)政治力量的干預 (五)威權人士著作的入藏 (六)編輯陣容與編輯態度的不盡理想 五. 結語 (一)中國著述之入藏數量逐漸增多,凸顯中國佛教文化 之獨立 (二)編輯態度之嚴謹與否,不盡然與其史料價值成正比 (三)從《大正》,《卍續》二藏可以看出古代藏經有甚多遺漏 |
ISSN | 10177132 (P) |
Hits | 1601 |
Created date | 2000.07.21
|
Modified date | 2017.06.20 |
|
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|