|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
傅翕宗教形像的歷史變遷=A Feasibility Study on Starch Wastewater by Ultrafiltration |
|
|
|
| Author |
藍日昌 =Lan, Jih-chang
|
|---|
| Source |
弘光學報=Bulletin On Hungkuang Institute Of Technology
|
|---|
| Volume | v.33 |
|---|
| Date | 1999.04 |
|---|
| Pages | 203 - 231 |
|---|
| Publisher | 私立弘光技術學院 |
|---|
| Publisher Url |
https://www.hk.edu.tw/
|
|---|
| Location | 臺中縣, 臺灣 [Taichung hsien, Taiwan] |
|---|
| Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| Language | 中文=Chinese |
|---|
| Note | 733
|
|---|
| Keyword | 藍日昌; Lan, Jih-chang; 傅翕; 傅大士; 燒身; 彌勒菩薩=Maitreya; 居士; Fu Si; Fu Ta Sie; Body-firing; Mullerbuddha; Lay Buddhist |
|---|
| Abstract | 六朝時期的宗教奇人傅翕，並非僧侶之流，但卻有不少的僧俗，道士等弟子，雖少不學問，但卻留下不少的詩歌偈頌，這些詩歌偈頌頗饒禪意，因此被視為禪宗的先驅人物，同時也有一些奇特異行的事跡傳世，據傳是彌勒佛下生，通常以博大士之名較常見. 傅翕通常被認為是禪宗的先驅人物，而天台宗也認為傅翕的禪觀與天台宗之學頗有相通處，唐宋後，又被認為是主張三教合一論者，唐宋以下的語錄中頗喜稱引之，認為他為維摩居士之流的異人，其
形像可說是隨時代的變動而有所轉化. 個人在比對各種的傳記資料後發現另一種形象的傅翕，傅翕其實是位六朝時期江南一地重要的彌勒下生信仰的傳播者，同時在其晚年之時，曾鼓動弟子進行激烈的燒身鉤燈，燃指，刺心酒血，割耳等宗教行為，這些奇特的舉動在後世的傳記資料中大多加以淡化或略過不談. 本文則想探討傅翕在江南傳教的過程及其形象轉化之因.
Summary
Fu Si was a wonder in religion in Six Dynasties. Although he was not a monk，not a few of his disciples were monks and Taoist priests. He had never attended any school; however，he left some jih-suhng rich in Zen flavor. Because of this, he was deemed as a Zen harbinger.
Moreover，it was said that he came into being as Mulerbuddha, owing to his peculiar behavior. Fu Si had different images in different times. He was considered as a harbinger of Zen，but religious people in the Ten-Tai sect in Tan Dynasty found that his Zen ideas had a lot in common with theirs. After Tan Dynasty and Sung Dynasty，people thought him to be an upholder of san-jiauh-unite. After studying different biographies, I found another image of Fu Si. He was a missionary of Mullerbuddha's dogma in the southern Yangtze River in Six Dynasties. As a matter of fact，in his old age，he even urged his
disciples to undergo intense acts of religious rituals, such as body-firing，finger-burning and so on. This kind of peculiar acts, however，was understand or omitted completely in most biographies.
Nevertheless, this paper was intended to inquire into the process of this missionary work in the southern Yangtze River and the causes of his different images. |
|---|
| ISSN | 10250662 (P) |
|---|
| Hits | 410 |
|---|
| Created date | 2001.02.27
|
|---|
| Modified date | 2024.01.26 |
|---|
 |
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
|
|
