|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
存在論區分與二諦論——對海德格爾與大乘佛學的比較研究=Heidegger’s"Ontological Difference" and Mahayana’s"Twi-satyas"Theory |
|
|
|
| Author |
吳學國
|
|---|
| Source |
河北學刊=Hebei Academic Journal
|
|---|
| Volume | v.24 n.1 |
|---|
| Date | 2004 |
|---|
| Pages | 67 - 71 |
|---|
| Publisher | 河北省社會科學院 |
|---|
| Publisher Url |
http://www.hebsky.gov.cn/index.jsp
|
|---|
| Location | 河北, 中國 [Hopei, China] |
|---|
| Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| Language | 中文=Chinese |
|---|
| Note | 全文下載: 中國期刊網－文史哲輯專欄目錄
|
|---|
| Keyword | 存在論區分; 二諦; 本無; 空; 有; 自由 |
|---|
| Abstract | "存在論區分"和"二諦"分別是海德格爾和大乘佛教哲學的基礎性概念。本文作為一種對話式的比較,通過揭示存在論區分的佛學意義以及二諦論的存在論區分意蘊,力圖使兩種思想達到相互理解和溝通。一方面,海氏對存在者與存在自身的區分,就是"有"與"無"的區分,其基本精神與佛教二諦論的"空"、"有"之辨一致,也旨在克服對"有"的執著而達到對"無"的證會。另一方面,二諦論也是一種存在論區分。"空"也是存在的本質和真理,也包括對形而上學的解構,"空"作為"無住",還與海氏的"無化"(自由)一致。二者的主要差別在於對"無"的理解不同。
Heidegger’s differentiation between the Being Itself and beings, namely that between"Nothingness"and"beingness"is similar to the Mahayana Buddhist distinction between"Sunya"and"bhava"in that both by virtue of the overcoming of obstinacy in"beingness"are aimed to reach recognition of "Nothingness", so that we say Heidegger’s thinking has Buddhist significance. And correspondingly we regard the"Twi-satyas"theory of Mahayana Buddhism also as a kind of"Ontological Difference". Just like Heidegger’s"Nothing"Sunya is the truth and essence of being, it also contains as its significance the deconstruction of Metaphysics."Sunya"in Chinese Buddhism is non-fixedness (Wu Zhu or aniketa), which means freedom in the same ontological significance with Heidegger’s"Nothing". The principal divergence in the Heideggerian and Mahayana theories consists in their different understanding of"Nothingness". Sunya, the Nothingness in Buddhism,is a being absolutely non-linguistic; So the difference between the two"satyas" is in fact that between the linguistic and the non-linguistic; To Heidegger, however, the Nothingness as Being itself is just the language itself or its essence, so the Ontological Difference is just distinction between the language essence and the beings coming into this language. Moreover Heidegger’s Nothing (Nichts) is time itself, whereas the Sunyata of Mahayana Buddhism is totally non-temporal. |
|---|
| Table of contents | 一、存在論區分的佛學意味 67
二、二諦論語存在論區分 69
三、結語 70 |
|---|
| ISSN | 10037071 (P) |
|---|
| Hits | 375 |
|---|
| Created date | 2004.01.07
|
|---|
| Modified date | 2023.08.04 |
|---|
 |
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
|
|
