|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
天台中道佛性思想與文化價值世界之安立=Tiantai Buddhism ‘Buddha nature of middle way' and the Basis of Cultural Living World |
|
|
|
| Author |
郭朝順 (著)=Kuo, Chao-shun (au.)
|
|---|
| Source |
玄奘佛學研究=Hsuan Chuang Journal of Buddhism Studies
|
|---|
| Volume | n.10 |
|---|
| Date | 2008.11.01 |
|---|
| Pages | 84 - 114 |
|---|
| Publisher | 玄奘大學 |
|---|
| Publisher Url |
http://ird.hcu.edu.tw/front/bin/home.phtml
|
|---|
| Location | 新竹市, 臺灣 [Hsinchu shih, Taiwan] |
|---|
| Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| Language | 中文=Chinese |
|---|
| Note | 作者為華梵大學哲學系副教授=Associate professor of Department Philosophy of Huafan University；本文口頭初次發表於第四屆「法華思想與天台佛學研討會」，現代佛教學會主辦，台北：台灣大學圖書館， 2008/5/2-3。 |
|---|
| Keyword | 天台=Tiantai; 中道=Middle way; 佛性=Buddha nature; 中道佛性=Buddha nature of middle way; 不斷斷=non-abandon to abandon |
|---|
| Abstract | 佛性（如來藏）思想是實體主義或是佛教梵天化的質疑，歷來有之，然而佛性思想之出現，在佛教面對世俗文化世界之存在的要求，乃不得不出現的一種解答，然而如何避免其淪為對於緣起性空思想的背離，這又是佛性思想非得加以處理的課題。天台中道佛性思想所演變出來的「圓融」理想，即可視為此看似兩難問題的解答。但是圓融理念，作為一種理想卻依然必須面對其退墮的危機，中道佛性作為圓融思想的理論基礎，如何自佛教傳統的中道思想演變出來，並嘗試克服佛性概念與性空思想之可能背離，同時安立眾生生存活動的文化世界之價值，這即是本文所欲呈現之天台對此重大問題的理解線索。
There are people always challenge about the ‘Buddha nature’ (tathAgata-garba) which was derived from ‘Brahman’ of Hinduism. Some Buddhist scholars criticize it will make Buddhism brahmanlize and become one kind of substantialism. But I think ‘Buddha nature’ was a response to those critiques of negative or nihilistic Buddhism that never care about the usual living world and its value. But this response will be effective only by according it can solve the contradiction to ZUnyata—the basic principle of Buddhism. Tiantai Buddhism’s ‘Buddha nature of middle way’ raised the ‘comprehensive idea’ of Chinese Buddhism is an possible answer of that. But ‘comprehensive idea’ still has its crisis to desacralize Buddhism to lose its original purpose of ZAkyamuni just like someone had criticized. This paper tries to show the track of Tiantai Buddhism’s ‘Buddha nature of middle way’, which emerged from the traditional middle way thinking in Indian Buddhism, but added whose own special understanding of Mahayana canons, such as Mahaparinirvana sutra, sadarmapudrika sutra (Lotus sutra), VimalakIrti-nirdeZa sutra, etc.. Only by interpreting this concept correctly we can make judge fairly about whether it indeed solve the contradiction or not. And we may further quest for that non-abandon the cultural living world to abandon its illusion, its meaning and value of this proposition. |
|---|
| Table of contents | 前言 83
一、印度佛教中道思想之發展 83
1.初期佛教的中道思想
2.龍樹的中道觀
3. 唯識中道
4.佛性中道
二、 天台中道佛性思想的成立 93
1.《法華經》不捨眾生的圓融教化
2.法華涅槃一味與圓融中道佛性理念之形成
3.《維摩詰經》「煩惱即菩提」思想與中道佛性的關聯
4.「不斷性惡」與慈悲思想
三、代結論：色香中道與文化價值世界的安立 111 |
|---|
| ISSN | 18133649 (P) |
|---|
| Hits | 849 |
|---|
| Created date | 2010.08.09 |
|---|
| Modified date | 2017.12.01 |
|---|
 |
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
|
|
