|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scholarly Reactions to the Aum and Waco Incidents |
|
|
|
Author |
Dorman, Benjamin
|
Source |
Japanese Journal of Religious Studies
|
Volume | v.39 n.1 |
Date | 2012 |
Pages | 153 - 177 |
Publisher | Nanzan Institute for Religion and Culture=南山宗教文化研究所 |
Publisher Url |
http://nirc.nanzan-u.ac.jp/en/
|
Location | 名古屋, 日本 [Nagoya, Japan] |
Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
Language | 英文=English |
Note | Benjamin Dorman is a permanent fellow at Nanzan Institute for Religion and Culture. |
Keyword | Branch Davidians; new religious movements (nrms); fieldwork; Waco |
Abstract | This article investigates some scholarly reactions towards the Aum incident of March 1995 and the incident of 1993 involving the Branch Davidians in Waco, Texas. The Waco incident began on 28 February 1993 with an armed exchange in which four federal agents and six Branch Davidians died, and ended on 19 April 1993 with the deaths of seventy-six Branch Davidians. While both incidents highlighted questions that democracies face in terms of the balance between protecting religious freedom and guaranteeing public safety, they also highlighted stark cultural differences in reactions, approaches, and expectations between scholars in Japan and the West, particularly the United States. There is, of course, a danger in attempting to compare the same research methods and assumptions scholars generally operate on in one region to another, in conjunction with prevailing social and cultural attitudes. Nevertheless, the growing field of new religious movements, or nrms, necessarily requires at least some consideration into scholarly methods and assumptions from an international perspective.
|
Table of contents | “Blowing the Lid” or “Putting a Lid on a Stinking Pot”? 155 Similarities and Differences 157 Waco and Aum as “Turning Points” 162 Differing Positions on Waco and Aum 164 The Study of New Religions in Japan 167 Conclusion 171 |
ISSN | 03041042 (P) |
Hits | 711 |
Created date | 2013.04.16 |
Modified date | 2017.09.13 |
|
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
|
|