Site mapAbout usConsultative CommitteeAsk LibrarianContributionCopyrightCitation GuidelineDonationHome        

CatalogAuthor AuthorityGoogle
Search engineFulltextScripturesLanguage LessonsLinks

Extra service
慧琳〈白黑論〉儒佛交涉之思理探微 ── 以其運用「得意」方式為主所作的觀察=A Study on the Thinking of Interplay between Confucianism and Buddhism in Hui Lin's Bai Hei Lun ── An Observation Mainly Based on "Getting the Meaning" Used in the Book
Author 紀志昌 (著)=Chi, Chih-chang (au.)
Source 文與哲=Literature
Pages201 - 240
Publisher Url
Location高雄市, 臺灣 [Kaohsiung shih, Taiwan]
Content type期刊論文=Journal Article
Note作者單位:國立中山大學中國文學系助理教授=Assistance Professor, Department of Chinese Literature, National Sun Yat-sen University.
Keyword慧琳=Hui Lin; 白黑論=Bai Hei Lun; 竺道生=Zhu Dao-sheng; 得意=Getting the meaning; 儒佛交涉=Interplay between Confucianism and Buddhism; 非佛=Anti-Buddhism

Hui Lin’s Bai Hei Lun has always been viewed as a work praising “Confucianism” and depreciating “Buddhism.” Its emergence triggered many disputes between “Confucianism” and “Buddhism” at that time. Therefore, it plays an important role in the history of Interplay between three beliefs. However, it was unbelievable that Hui Lin, as a Buddhist, censored Buddhism. This study re-inspected relevant details, including Hui Lin’s background of learning process, favorable or unfavorable turns in life, and relationship with Buddhism, in order to deduce his writing motivation, reflect on metaphors in the book, and further obtain more reasonable and possible truth.
This study preliminarily observed Hui Lin’s thinking based on his intercourse of border between “Confucian Ethical Codes” and “Buddhism” and further investigated his “Buddhist concept.” This study found that Hui Lin’s Bai Hei Lun could not be simply defined as a work Anti-Buddhism because it still advocated the spirit and meaning of Buddhism. In addition, his relationship with Zhu Dao-sheng is particularly noteworthy. Based on the comparison with relevant clues, this study suggested that, in terms of motivation, besides reproaching Buddhism for the rule abiding turning out to be a mere formality, the contents revealed his approval for Zhu Dao-sheng’s Buddhist spirit, namely, “informality” and “getting the meaning.” These concepts enabled him to integrate Confucianism with Buddhism. Based on the above, this study investigated the texts of the book from three aspects:(1 understanding of the concept of “Śūnya”; (2) understanding of the concept of the nether world; (3)the same goal of Confucianism and Buddhism. It was hoped that the metaphors and response to Dao-sheng’s theories in the book revealing Hui Lin’ approval for Dao-sheng could be identified in this study and be provided for academic circles to criticize Bai Hei Lun from a broader and more objective perspective.
Table of contents一、前論:慧琳〈白黑論〉寫作的相關背景 202
(一)生平際遇 202
(二)師承或交遊之因緣 207
二、〈白黑論〉內容分疏 214
(一)空觀理解 ── 性理空而事用不空 215
(二)對幽冥之理的理解 ── 遺其所寄之說 220
(三)儒、佛之殊途同歸 ── 宜尋所立之旨 227
三、總結:〈白黑論〉的檢討與評價 234
引用文獻 237
英文摘要 239
ISSN17287130 (P)
Created date2014.09.09
Modified date2024.02.20

Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE


You are leaving our website for The full text resources provided by the above database or electronic journals may not be displayed due to the domain restrictions or fee-charging download problems.

Record correction

Please delete and correct directly in the form below, and click "Apply" at the bottom.
(When receiving your information, we will check and correct the mistake as soon as possible.)

Serial No.

Search History (Only show 10 bibliography limited)
Search Criteria Field Codes
Search CriteriaBrowse