Site mapAbout usConsultative CommitteeAsk LibrarianContributionCopyrightCitation GuidelineDonationHome        

CatalogAuthor AuthorityGoogle
Search engineFulltextScripturesLanguage LessonsLinks
 


Extra service
Tools
Export
Ratnākaraśānti's Theory of Cognition with False Mental Images (*alīkākāravāda) and the Neither-OneNor-Many Argument
Author Moriyama, S. (著)
Source Journal of Indian Philosophy
Volumev.42 n.2-3
Date2014.06
Pages339 - 351
PublisherSpringer
Publisher Url http://www.springer.com/gp/
LocationBerlin, Germany [柏林, 德國]
Content type期刊論文=Journal Article
Language英文=English
NoteS. Moriyama (&)
Department of Philosophy, Shinshu University, Matsumoto, Japan
e-mail: smoriyam@shinshu-u.ac.jp
KeywordRatnākaraśānti; Śāntarakṣita; Alīkākāravāda; Neither-one-nor-many argument
AbstractThe paper aims to clarify Ratnākaraśānti?s epistemological theory that mental images in a cognition are false (*alīkākāravāda) in comparison with Śāntarakṣita?s criticism of the Yogācāra position. Although Ratnākaraśānti frequently uses the neither-one-nor-many argument for explaining his Yogācāra position, the argument, unlike Śāntarakṣita?s original one, does not function for refuting the existence of awareness itself as the basis of mental images. This point is examined in the first two sections of this paper by analyzing Ratnākaraśānti?s proof of the selflessness of entities (dharmanairātmya) and his application of the neither-one-nor-many argument for demonstrating the falsehood of mental images. On the other hand, the last section investigates into his defense of the alīkākāravāda against Śāntarakṣita?s severe criticism of it. Here, too, we can find his tactical usage of the neither-one-nor-many argument, or more precisely, one of its variants: the neither-identical-nor-different argument. Through the above procedure, we can see how Yogācāra philosophy survived in the late period of Indian Buddhism by blending the Madhyamaka opponent?s argument with its own thought.
Table of contentsIntroduction 339
Neither-One-Nor-Many-Arguments to Prove the Selflessness of Entities (dharmanairātmya) 341
The Scope of Ratnākaraśānti’s Neither-One-Nor-Many Argument 344
Ratnākaraśānti’s Defense Against Śāntarakṣita’s Criticism of the alīkākāravāda 345
Conclusion 348
References 349
ISSN00221791 (P); 15730395 (E)
Hits194
Created date2014.12.31
Modified date2022.04.07



Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE

Notice

You are leaving our website for The full text resources provided by the above database or electronic journals may not be displayed due to the domain restrictions or fee-charging download problems.

Record correction

Please delete and correct directly in the form below, and click "Apply" at the bottom.
(When receiving your information, we will check and correct the mistake as soon as possible.)

Serial No.
539764

Search History (Only show 10 bibliography limited)
Search Criteria Field Codes
Search CriteriaBrowse