|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
中古時代瑞應圖書的源流：敦煌文獻與日本寫本的綜合考察=The Origin and Development of Books on Ruiying (omen) in Medieval China: Integrated Studies on the Basis of Dunhuang and Japanese Manuscripts 4:15-5:15 Panel 7: Tibetan Manuscri |
|
|
|
| Author |
余欣 (著)=Yu, Xin (au.)
|
|---|
| Source |
International Conference at Princeton University=普林斯頓大學學術國際研討會
|
|---|
| Date | 2014.09.06 - 08 |
|---|
| Publisher Url |
http://csr.princeton.edu/dunhuangmanuscripts/
|
|---|
| Location | New Jersey, US [紐澤西州, 美國] |
|---|
| Content type | 會議論文=Proceeding Article |
|---|
| Language | 中文=Chinese |
|---|
| Note | 作者單位為復旦大學。 |
|---|
| Abstract | 本文旨在探討瑞應圖書的源流及其在唐代的政治实践，試圖將史志著錄、圖像材料與敦煌文獻、日本古寫本結合，綜合考察漢唐瑞應圖書的知識社會史，從知識內核和文本語境出發，重繪中古瑞應圖書的成立過程與知識－信仰－制度結構。
本文首先提出，符應之說爲陰陽五行學說理論具象化之產物，與先秦方術－博物之學頗有淵源，因此所謂“禎祥變怪”，應從博物學傳統來理解。在對漢唐間《瑞應圖》的分合流變作了簡略分析之後，本文藉由尊經閣藏《天地瑞祥志》寫本，討論了瑞應圖籍在唐代的流佈與傳承，並由此窺探祥瑞知識體系的構建方式。第三部分通過對瑞應圖的視覺文獻系譜的分析，來揭示寫本中的文本與圖像關係，對早期瑞應圖書存在的痕跡、禎祥圖像的各種表現形式，作了較為詳細的論考，並與敦煌本《瑞應圖》和《白澤精怪圖》做了一些比較研究。最後一部分是關於瑞應圖在塑造政治合法性的實際功能的考察：瑞應圖作爲官方判定爲祥瑞依據而確立的歷程，唐代律令體制下的制度化措施，以及如何突破固有規制，將非制度固化爲制度種種做法。總之，本文希冀通過“知識的內聖外王史”研究，解決祥瑞文獻中的若干核心議題，盡可能地揭示其於中國學術思想史之價值，並對敦煌研究如何拓展新視野與新方法，提出願景。
Ruiying, also known as xiangrui, furui or fuying, is a special ideology, political technique and cultural phenomenon in traditional China. This article is to investigate the origin and development of ruiying and its role in the political practice in the Tang Dynasty. The author used historical records, images and inscriptions, Dunhuang and Japanese manuscripts, to throw a new light on the knowledge history of books on Ruiying during the Han to Tang period, and to repaint a new scene of historical progress of its formation and the structure of the knowledge-faith-institution system, from a multiple angle of knowledge kernel and context.
The author argues that the ruiying can be viewed as a concrete result of Yinyang School, and has a root, which comes up from fangshu-bowuxue, and it is necessary to understand the ruiying under the context of the tradition of Chinese bowuxue. After a brief analysis of the evolution of books on ruiying, the author discussed the transmission of these knowledge in Tang dynasty on the basis of the manuscript Tiandi ruixiang zhi, now in the Sonkeikaku bunko, Tokyo. My aim is to help discern the logic in the organization of the text and its approach to cultural epistemology. Then, the author revealed the relation between the image and the text in manuscript culture, through textual research on the visual genealogy of books on ruiying. The author traced the mark of the existence of ancient books on ruiying, deferent performances of the images of omen（xiangrui or zaiyi）, and proceeded a comparative study with the Dunhuang manuscript Ruiying tu and Baizhe jinguai tu. In the last part, the author turned to explore the function books on ruiying in the construction of political validity: how books on ruiying became the standard to identify an omen, how the ruiying involved in the institution in the statutory society of Tang, and how an informal xiangrui got official affirmation and entered the new Ruiying tu.
In summary, this article will use a crucial yet underappreciated text of the medieval period to rethink some of the major issues of ruiying in Chinese intellectual history, and to development a new horizon and method in the prospect of Dunhuang studies. |
|---|
| Hits | 527 |
|---|
| Created date | 2015.01.15 |
|---|
| Modified date | 2015.08.17 |
|---|
 |
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
|
|
