|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Were Sa-pan and 'Jig-rten-mgon-po "Neoconservatives?" Utility and Futility of Source-Culture Alien Categories |
|
|
|
| Author |
Sobisch, Jan-Ulrich
|
|---|
| Source |
Indo-Iranian Journal
|
|---|
| Volume | v.53 n.1 |
|---|
| Date | 2010.03 |
|---|
| Pages | 23 - 33 |
|---|
| Publisher | Brill |
|---|
| Publisher Url |
http://www.brill.com/
|
|---|
| Location | Leiden, the Netherlands [萊登, 荷蘭] |
|---|
| Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| Language | 英文=English |
|---|
| Keyword | BUDDHISM; 'BRI-GUNG-PA; SA-SKYA-PA; TIBET |
|---|
| Abstract | In his influential Tibetan Renaissance (publ. 2005), Ronald Davidson categorizes the two eminent masters of the late 12th and early 13th centuries, Sa-skya Pandita Kun-dga'-rgyal-mtshan and 'Bri-gung 'Jig-rten-mgon-po, as "neoconservatives," portraying them as having an un-Buddhist and inauthentic fixation on India, and as working to suppress any deviation from their norms. This paper critically investigates Davidson's general and specific interpretations of his categorization and raises the question of methodology. |
|---|
| Table of contents | Introduction 23
Tibetan Neoconservatism in Tibetan Renaissance 24
Neoconservatives vs. Ancient Aristocracy 26
Un-Indian, Un-Buddhist, and the Limits of the Canon 27
Deception, Betrayal, and Heresy 30
Methodological Considerations 32
References 32
|
|---|
| ISSN | 00197246 (P); 15728536 (E) |
|---|
| Hits | 88 |
|---|
| Created date | 2015.01.27 |
|---|
| Modified date | 2019.12.17 |
|---|
 |
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
|
|
