Site mapAbout usConsultative CommitteeAsk LibrarianContributionCopyrightCitation GuidelineDonationHome        

CatalogAuthor AuthorityGoogle
Search engineFulltextScripturesLanguage LessonsLinks

Extra service
從當代儒佛辯諍談中國哲學研究視野=On the Vision of the Study of Chinese Philosophy from the Perspective of the Contemporary Argument between Confucianism and Buddhism
Author 杜保瑞
Source 哲學與文化=Monthly Review of Philosophy and Culture
Volumev.40 n.8
Pages97 - 114
Publisher Url
Location臺北市, 臺灣 [Taipei shih, Taiwan]
Content type期刊論文=Journal Article
Keyword儒佛辯諍=Argument between Confucianism and Buddhism; 梁漱溟=Liang Shu-ming; 熊十力=Xung Shi-li; 馮友蘭=Feng You-Ian; 方束美=Thome H. Fang; 唐君毅=Tang Jun-yi; 牟宗三=Mou Zongsan; 勞思光=Lao Sze-kwang

Here we approach how the contemporary circle of Chinese philosophy deals with the argument between Confucianism and Buddhism, showing the contemporary scene of this issue through the opinions of twenty contemporary Chinese philosophers. Liang Shu-ming juxtaposed Confucianism and Buddhism; Xung Shi-li gave up Confucianism for Buddhism; Feng You-Ian interpreted both Confucianism and Buddhism; Thome H. Fang celebrated both Confucianism and Buddhism; Tang Jun-yi put Confucianism before Buddhism; Mou Zongsan praised Confucianism and suppressed Buddhism; and Lao Sze-kwang judged both Confucianism and Buddhism. Basically, due to its particular world view and concept of karma, Buddhism can't be discussed in relation to Confucianism on equal basis. The conclusion of praising Confucianism and suppressing Buddhism is inevitable if the particular cosmology of Buddhism is not respected. In view of these seven great contemporary philosophers, the more we understand the Buddhist world view, the more we would respect the function and value of Buddhism. On the other hand, if the Buddhism world view is not understood, one would judge Buddhism even more from the Confucian standpoint. In the writer's opinion, there is no argument between Confucianism and Buddhism, and the best approach is through mutual understanding and appreciation.
ISSN10158383 (P); 10158383 (E)
Created date2015.04.16
Modified date2017.10.24

Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE


You are leaving our website for The full text resources provided by the above database or electronic journals may not be displayed due to the domain restrictions or fee-charging download problems.

Record correction

Please delete and correct directly in the form below, and click "Apply" at the bottom.
(When receiving your information, we will check and correct the mistake as soon as possible.)

Serial No.

Search History (Only show 10 bibliography limited)
Search Criteria Field Codes
Search CriteriaBrowse