|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dzong-ka-ba on Chandrakirti's Assertion of “non-dependence on another” as the Object to be Negated in the View of Emptiness |
|
|
|
| Author |
Magee, William
|
| Source |
Canadian Journal of Buddhist Studies
|
| Volume | v.4 |
| Date | 2008 |
| Pages | 29 - 53 |
| Publisher | Nalanda College of Buddhist Studies |
| Publisher Url |
http://jps.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/cjbs
|
| Location | Toronto, Canada [多倫多, 加拿大] |
| Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| Language | 英文=English |
| Abstract | Geluk presentations of Madhyamika contend that innate ignorance erroneously superimposes a certain look and feel onto reality. This illusory impression is called “the object to be negated” (dgag bya,pratiSedya) and, in the Prasangika-Madhyamika School, “inherent existence” or “own- being” (rangbzhin, svabhava). This article examines both Candrakirti's (6th–7th C.E.) identification of the object to be negated—“non-dependence on another”—and Dzong-ka-ba’s claim that this is the same as “established by way of own entity” (rang gi ngo bos grub pa). Also discussed are six separate definitions of “dependence” allowed in Dzong-ka-ba’s Geluk system. Finally, in an appendix following the body of this work, I present my translation of an annotation from Nga-wang-bel-den’s Annotations for (Jamyang- shay-ba’s) “Great Exposition of Tenets,” which addresses these issues. |
| Table of contents | Abstract 29 Introduction 29 Part One: Non-Dependence According to Ngawang-Bel-Den 30 1.1 Qualm One 31 1.2 Qualm Two 32 1.3 Qualm Three 34 1.4 Qualm Four 35 Part Two: Non-Dependence for CandrakƯrti and Dzong-ka-ba 36 Concluding Remarks 42 Appendix: Nga-wang-bel-den's Annotation ta —Delineation of the Object of Negation, A Self of Phenomena 43 Bibliography 47 Works by Modern Authors 48
|
| ISSN | 1710825X (P); 17108268 (E) |
| Hits | 643 |
| Created date | 2015.05.05 |
| Modified date | 2017.07.19 |

|
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
|
|