Site mapAbout usConsultative CommitteeAsk LibrarianContributionCopyrightCitation GuidelineDonationHome        

CatalogAuthor AuthorityGoogle
Search engineFulltextScripturesLanguage LessonsLinks

Extra service
動物解放與護生行動 : 從關懷生命協會的角度來探討=The Animal Liberation and the Action of Life Protection : Discussion from the Standpoint of the Life Conservationist Association
Author 林朝成 (著)=Lin, Chao-cheng (au.)
Source 玄奘佛學研究=Hsuan Chuang Journal of Buddhism Studies
Volumen.23 佛教與國際動保論述專輯
Pages175 - 195
Publisher Url
Location新竹市, 臺灣 [Hsinchu shih, Taiwan]
Content type期刊論文=Journal Article
本文初稿曾發表於 2014 年 4 月 27 日玄奘大學宗教學系、中華民國關懷生命學會、財團法人弘誓文教基金會主辦的「動物解放、動物權與生態平權——東、西方哲學與宗教對話」國際會議。投稿過程,二位匿名審查人細心的指正和寶貴的意見,對本文的修改和論點的釐清,助益良多,特此致謝。
Keyword動物解放=Animal liberation; 關懷生命協會=Life Conservationist Association; 動物權=animal rights; 護生=life protection; 釋昭慧=Chao-hwei Shih

In 1993, when the Life Conservationist Association was founded, a life-based philosophy of Life Protection was also proposed. It becomes the guiding principles for theory building and points out the direction for actual practice. Yet, to keep away from narrowing the development of the Association as becoming a religious group, a non-religious assertion for animal protection has to be established. Therefore, the Association has translated and published Peter Singer's monument, Animal Liberation in 1996, in order to introduce ideas of animal protection in the West. This work has become a classic and it has provided powerful theoretical framework supporting the argument of animal protection. This paper attempts to make an argument from three claims: animal liberation, ethics of life protection and animal rights. Their foundation of morality and evidence of proof will be analyzed, in order to examine the debate formed during the cross-dialogues among them. The purpose is not to look at the development of animal protection of the Association, but to analyze the basis of argumentation and the practical orientation of the ethics of life protection, under the context and environment in Taiwan. From the comparison among different theories, this study learns that the Association has underestimated the significance of animal rights in the animal protection campaign, and this indicates that the theory specified in the objective of the Association to promote animal rights is perhaps not legitimate. Therefore, we propose that the ethics of life protection can be a potential way of establishing animal rights, and this may also become resources of theory for the action of life protection.
Table of contents摘要 175
Abstract 177
一、與動物解放對話 180
二、護生倫理的實踐向度 184
三、動物權與護生行動 188
四、結語 194
參考書目 195

ISSN18133649 (P)
Created date2016.06.16
Modified date2022.03.04

Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE


You are leaving our website for The full text resources provided by the above database or electronic journals may not be displayed due to the domain restrictions or fee-charging download problems.

Record correction

Please delete and correct directly in the form below, and click "Apply" at the bottom.
(When receiving your information, we will check and correct the mistake as soon as possible.)

Serial No.

Search History (Only show 10 bibliography limited)
Search Criteria Field Codes
Search CriteriaBrowse