|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Philosophy of Doctrinal Classification: Kōyama Iwao and Mou Zongsan |
|
|
|
Author |
Asakura, Tomomi
|
Source |
Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy
|
Volume | v.13 n.4 |
Date | 2014.12 |
Pages | 453 - 468 |
Publisher | Springer Science & Business Media B.V. |
Publisher Url |
http://www.springer.com/gp/
|
Location | Dordrecht, the Netherlands [多德雷赫特, 荷蘭] |
Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
Language | 英文=English |
Note | Tomomi Asakura, Faculty of Education, Hokkaido University of Education (Kushiro), Kushiro, Japan |
Keyword | MOU Zongsan=牟宗三; KŌYAMA Iwao=高山岩男; NISHIDA Kitarō=西田幾多郎; Tiantai=天台; Buddhism; Buddhistic ontolog; Logic of basho=場所 |
Abstract | Doctrinal classification or the panjiao 判教 system of Chinese Buddhism has been rediscovered and renewed in modern East Asian philosophy since both the Kyoto School and New Confucianism clarified the philosophical meaning of this intellectual tradition. The theoretical relation between these two modern reconsiderations, however, has not yet been studied. I analyze the theory of panjiao in KŌYAMA Iwao 高山岩男 (1905–1993) and MOU Zongsan 牟宗三 (1909–1995) so as to identify and extract, despite their apparent irrelevance, the same type of philosophical argument concerning the ontological character of yuanjiao 圓教. My analysis shows that Mou’s distinction between the “two-door mind” paradigm and Buddhistic ontology in his interpretation of Tiantai 天台 Buddhism corresponds to Kōyama’s distinction between an idealistic system and the existential turn in his generalized panjiao system. |
Table of contents | 1 Introduction 453 2 Kōyama on the Existential Turn 455 3 Mou on Perfect Teaching 460 4 The Existential Turn and Perfect Teaching 463 5 Concluding Remarks 466 References 468 |
ISSN | 15403009 (P); 15697274 (E) |
DOI | 10.1007/s11712-014-9397-7 |
Hits | 79 |
Created date | 2017.06.07 |
Modified date | 2019.11.12 |
|
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
|
|